Skip to content

featuring historical research, writing, and media at st. mary's university

  • World History

    World History

    Menu
    • World History
    • Pre-Classical History (to 600 BCE)
    • Classical History (600 BCE-600 CE)
    • Post-Classical History (600 CE-1492 CE)
    • Early Modern History (1492-1789)
    • Modern History (1789-1914)
    • Global History (1900-present)

    From the Ancient World

    The Battle of Zama: Rome's Vengeance

    Posted by Davis Nickle12/01/2020

    From the Modern World

    The Holy See Takes On The Fight Against Climate Change

    Posted by Victor Rodriguez11/30/2020

    Regional Histories

    Menu
    • African and African American Studies
    • Latin American Studies
  • US History

    Early America

    Menu
    • US-Three Worlds Meet (to 1620)
    • US-Colonization and Settlement (1585-1763)
    • US-Revolution and the New Nation (1754-1820s)
    • US-Expansion and Reform (1801-1861)
    • US-Civil War & Reconstruction (1850-1877)

    Jackie Robinson: An Unexpected Hero of Business and Civil Rights

    Posted by Todd Brauckmiller Jr.11/01/2019

    The Non-Stick Chemical That Stuck DuPont with a Stiff Bill In The Courtroom

    Posted by Aleea Costilla10/30/2020

    Infamous story of the Beach Boys and Murderous Manic: Charles Manson

    Posted by Mauro Bustamante11/26/2019

    RuPaul's Influence On Drag: You Better Work!

    Posted by Nadia Carrasco04/07/2019

    Lucy Hobbs Taylor: The Woman Who Pulled Teeth

    Posted by Giselle Garcia02/28/2020

    The Duchess of Windsor—How the IRS Helped Create Same Gender Marriage

    Posted by Christopher Metta Bexar04/07/2019

    Elvis: The Rise of the Rock and Roll King

    Posted by Alexander Avina12/06/2019

    Untold Stories of Mexican-American Lynchings

    Posted by Paul Garza12/09/2019

    Adrian Vidal: A Tejano Caught Between Two Wars

    Posted by Paul Garza10/22/2019

    Breaking Silence or Just Speaking Louder?: The Story of Larry Nassar and his 499 Victims

    Posted by Paola Arellano04/07/2019

    Why We Should Defend Human Gene Editing

    Posted by Emily Velazquez04/07/2019

    MS-13: Origin of the Most Dangerous Gang in the World

    Posted by Juliana Montoya03/06/2020

    Thomas Gallaudet: The Voice of the Deaf

    Posted by Yazmin Garza04/06/2019

    Gun Violence in America: The Sandy Hook Story

    Posted by Diamond Estrada11/14/2019

    A Charlie Brown Debut: Introduction to the First 'Peanuts' Member of Color

    Posted by Rebeca Escobar04/02/2019

    The First Woman Jockey Who made History in a Pari-mutuel Race

    Posted by Kelsey Sanchez11/14/2019

    From Being a Christian and Ex-Military to being a Serial Killer: Israel Keyes

    Posted by Adrianna Hernandez10/31/2020

    ADHD Among Americans: From Childhood to Adulthood

    Posted by Josephine Tran11/15/2019

    Jaime Cuervo: La Opresión Ignorada Del Latinoamericano

    Posted by Matthew Bennett11/25/2020

    Al Capone: The Real Life Scarface

    Posted by Raul Vallejo11/15/2019

    The Artistic Duo: The Inspiring Story of Jean Michel Basquiat and Andy Warhol

    Posted by Nelly Perez10/22/2019

    Raping and Killing: "Casualties of War" in Vietnam

    Posted by Doan Mai12/14/2019

    Bonnie and Clyde's Darkest Hour

    Posted by Sebastian Portilla11/15/2019

    Tulsa Massacre 1921: Buck Colbert Franklin in the Greenwood District

    Posted by Alicia Martinez11/05/2020

    Trump vs The Vote: What Really Happened in the 2016 Election?

    Posted by Kendall Guajardo11/30/2020

    Fuel for His Pen: The Two Consecutive Plane Accidents of Ernest Hemingway

    Posted by Felipe Macias10/08/2019

    ¡Si, Se Puede! – Collective Organizing, Unions, and Non Violent Protests

    Posted by Eric Grant11/19/2020

    Walt Disney and the building of his Magic Kingdom

    Posted by Malik Heard12/06/2019

    Hugs Not Walls: Reunification of Families on the South Border

    Posted by Eliane Castorena05/07/2020

    Ted Kennedy: Reputation Drowns With Victim

    Posted by Charli Delmonico10/16/2019

    Contemporary America

    Menu
    • US-Industrial United States (1870-1900)
    • US-Emergence of Modern America (1890-1930)
    • US-Great Depression & WWII (1929-1945)
    • US-Postwar United States (1945-early 1970s)
    • US-Contemporary United States (1968-present)
  • Themes

    SPICE Categories

    Specialty Categories

    Special Themes

    Menu
    • Social History
    • Political History
    • Environmental History
    • Cultural History
    • Economic History
    Menu
    • Art History
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Gender Studies
    • Human Rights
    • Public Health and Medicine
    • International Relations
    • Linguistics
    Menu
    • Military History
    • Music
    • People
    • Psychology
    • Religion
    • Science & Technology
    • Sports
    Menu
    • Catholic Heritage
    • The Year 1968
    • COVID-19
    • Social Justice
    • Spanish Language
  • Showcase

    Showcase Editions

    • Vol 1 – 2016
      • Vol 1 No 1 Aug-Sep 2016
      • Vol 1 No 2 Oct-Nov 2016
    • Vol 2 – 2017
      • Vol 2 No 1 Jan-Feb 2017
      • Vol 2 No 2 Mar-Apr 2017
      • Vol 2 No 3 Aug-Sep 2017
      • Vol 2 No 4 Oct-Nov 2017
    • Vol 3 – 2018
      • Vol 3 No 1 Jan-Feb 2018
      • Vol 3 No 2 Mar-Apr 2018
      • Vol 3 No 3 Aug-Sep 2018
      • Vol 3 No 4 Oct-Nov 2018
    • Vol 4 – 2019
      • Vol 4 No 1 Jan-Feb 2019
      • Vol 4 No 2 Mar-Apr 2019
      • Vol 4 No 3 Aug-Sep 2019
      • Vol 4 No 4 Oct-Nov 2019
    • Vol 5 – 2020
      • Vol 5 No 1 Jan-Feb 2020
      • Vol 5 No 2 Mar-Apr 2020
      • Vol 5 No 3 Aug-Sep 2020
    Menu
    • Vol 1 – 2016
      • Vol 1 No 1 Aug-Sep 2016
      • Vol 1 No 2 Oct-Nov 2016
    • Vol 2 – 2017
      • Vol 2 No 1 Jan-Feb 2017
      • Vol 2 No 2 Mar-Apr 2017
      • Vol 2 No 3 Aug-Sep 2017
      • Vol 2 No 4 Oct-Nov 2017
    • Vol 3 – 2018
      • Vol 3 No 1 Jan-Feb 2018
      • Vol 3 No 2 Mar-Apr 2018
      • Vol 3 No 3 Aug-Sep 2018
      • Vol 3 No 4 Oct-Nov 2018
    • Vol 4 – 2019
      • Vol 4 No 1 Jan-Feb 2019
      • Vol 4 No 2 Mar-Apr 2019
      • Vol 4 No 3 Aug-Sep 2019
      • Vol 4 No 4 Oct-Nov 2019
    • Vol 5 – 2020
      • Vol 5 No 1 Jan-Feb 2020
      • Vol 5 No 2 Mar-Apr 2020
      • Vol 5 No 3 Aug-Sep 2020
  • About

    Course Readings

    Article Indexes

    About Us

    Menu
    • Course Readings – SC 3300 – Nash
    • Course Readings – SMC 1301 – Wieck
    • Course Readings – PO 4334 – Dr Celine
    Menu
    • Course Readings – HS 2321 – Whitener
    • Course Readings – HS 2322 – Whitener
    • Course Readings – SMC 1301 – Whitener
    Menu
    • Our Article/Author Index
    • Award Winning Articles
    Menu
    • Our StMU History Media Project
    • Our Faculty Consultants
    • Our Writers
    • Contact Us
  • Explanatory Article, Global History (1900-present), Human Rights, International Relations, Journalistic Explanatory, People, Political History, World History
  • November 12, 2019

A Dreaded Nightmare: Reinhard Heydrich and the Start of the Holocaust

The ramp at Auschwitz-II-Birkenau in German-occupied Poland, photo taken in June 1944 by an unknown photographer | Courtesy of Yad Vashem
The ramp at Auschwitz-II-Birkenau in German-occupied Poland, photo taken in June 1944 by an unknown photographer | Courtesy of Yad Vashem
Amelia Hew

Amelia Hew

Winner of the Fall 2019 StMU History Media Award for

Best Article in the Category of “World History”

In the evening of November 9, 1938, the state-sponsored pogrom on the German-Jewish community occurred throughout Germany that would subsequently be called Kristallnacht. It occurred under the orders of Reinhard Heydrich, the Chief of the Reich Security Main Office, and Heinrich Himmler, the Reichsfuhrer-SS. Heydrich called Gestapo chief Heinrich Muller and put all regional State Police across the Reich on full alert and prepared for the arrest of 20,000 to 30,000 Jews, particularly targeting wealthy Jews. Later that night, Nazi activists destroyed synagogues and Jewish shops throughout Germany. They stole their belongings and forced them out of their homes to abuse, humiliate, and in many cases, murder them.1 Over the next 48 hours, more than 1,000 synagogues were burned and 7,000 businesses were ransacked and windows broken. Some 30,000 Jewish men between the ages of sixteen and sixty were arrested and sent to newly expanded concentration camps. The police stood by as the violence—often committed by neighbors, not strangers—raged on. Firemen were instructed to ensure that the flames did not spread to adjacent Aryan property, but absolutely not to put out the fires at the synagogues. Thus, most of the synagogues left standing were small synagogues that were part of other buildings.2

Interior of Berlin’s Fasanenstrasse Synagogue, destroyed during the Kristallnacht on November 9, 1938, photo taken by Abraham Pisarek | Courtesy of Wikipedia

In 1933, there were approximately 500,000 Jews in Germany; however, after Hitler came to power and became Chancellor of Germany, the discrimination and harassment of the Jews in Germany increased drastically. Throughout Germany, Jewish children were constantly met with hostility from their classmates or teachers with disparaging words scribbled on their school supplies. They were also insulted openly in school, and it even escalated to physical bullying. Jewish shops were vandalized by Nazi Stormtroopers (SA), who daubed paint over the shop windows with the words “Germans do not buy in Jewish shops,” and “The Jews are our misery,” among other such expressions of hate.3 Having harassed the Jews in a physical way, the Nazis turned to the law. On April 7, 1933, Hitler’s government passed its first pieces of anti-Semitic legislation. The Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service called for state officials who were not of Aryan descent to be removed from their positions, and a similar law stated that non-Aryan lawyers were required to cease practicing law. At the end of April, a third law was announced that limited the number of Jewish students in state schools and universities.4 In September 1935, a set of laws called the Protection of German Blood and German Honor, also known as the Nuremberg Laws, was passed by the Reichstag and were promulgated at the annual Nazi Party rally in the Bavarian town of Nuremberg. The laws stated that marriage, as well as sexual relations between Jews and citizens of “German or kindred blood,” was prohibited. Only racially “pure” Germans were entitled to civil and political rights. Jews were reduced to the status of subjects of the state.5 Two basic categories were established by the middle of November 1935, stating that a Jew was anyone who descended from at least three Jewish grandparents. The Nazis considered a Jewish grandparent to be a full blooded Jew if he or she belonged to the Jewish religious community. Thus the Nazis determined race by the religious affiliation of grandparents.6 By the year 1938, only 185,000 Jews remained within Germany. In this first period of Nazi rule in Germany, from 1933 to 1939, their policy toward the Jews was one of harassment, so that Jews would leave Germany voluntarily. And that policy seemed to be working right up to the dawn of the Second World War.

On September 1, 1939, German troops invaded Poland from the west, and in just over two weeks, their ally, the Red Army of the Soviet Union, invaded Poland from the east. As the Wehrmacht crossed into Poland, Reinhard Heydrich arranged with the German Army High Command for more than 2,000 Einsatzgruppen to enter the country immediately behind the army. Heydrich’s orders were for the Einsatzgruppen to make sure that “the higher echelons of the Polish population [were] to be rendered as good as harmless.”7 This resulted in the deaths of about 16,000 Poles, which was a mix of the intelligentsia, Catholic priesthood, Jews, and anyone else they considered hostile. The atrocities committed by the Einsatzgruppen was so outrageous that even some members of the German army were appalled by their actions. However, all this brutality was only a prelude to the infamous Holocaust. Although several thousands of Jews were murdered, Hitler and the Nazi leadership were also targeting the leadership class within Poland, and the overarching German policy toward the Jews remained one of harassment, despite the fact that the Nazis now began to have Jews under its control in the millions, instead of the two hundred thousand they had a month earlier.8

The Einsatzgruppen were units formed by Heydrich under the order of Heinrich Himmler in 1939. The core of the units came from Heydrich’s Security Police (Gestapo and Kripo) as well as his intelligence apparatus, and they were supplied by small units of Waffen-SS, a military branch of Himmler’s SS.9 Their aim was to secure order through each phase of the Nazi empire’s expansion. However, the units underwent a critical change in Poland. Like the Gestapo, they had always used brutal but traditional policing techniques in Germany. But that policy changed in Poland. The security mind-set operating there had already lowered the threshold for violence.10 The invasion of Poland in 1939 brought more than a million Jews under the German’s control. Heydrich and the Nazi leaders were faced with a problem that they had not encountered before the war. How would they deal with so many more Jews with their policy of harassment? In fact, harassment was not even possible in Poland. There was nowhere for them to leave to. Therefore, Heydrich directed the Einsatzgruppen to begin to exterminate Jews throughout the former land of Poland, village by village. The Einsatzgruppen would show up in a town or village, march the Jews into the forest outside of town, sometimes to the edge of a gravel pit. The Jews would face a six-foot drop. Then the Einsatzgruppen would shoot their victims at their necks, and the victims would slump into the pit. The Einsatzgruppen took turns in this grizzly business of murder, in between drinking large quantities of liquor, so as to endure their ordeal of killing. They performed these acts of murder by the hundreds per day, regardless of sex and ages of their victims. The process would be repeated over and over again at the same place, until all Jews of the town or village had been thus liquidated. In this way, the Jews had to look down at the growing number of corpses in the pit who might have been their family or friends before being shot themselves.11 However, the daily shootings also took its toll on the Einsatzgruppen. Such daily acts of sheer murder became a traumatic activity for the members of the killing units, and created alcoholics among them, and many had nervous breakdowns as well. The mass killings of Jews in this way only escalated with the invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941, when the numbers of Jews under Nazi control again rose by millions. Himmler tasked Odilo Globocnik, the SS and Police leader in Lublin, to find a new method for the murder of the Jews that would be less disturbing and much less public. The alternative method was to lead to the deportation of Jews to extermination or death camps to be gassed. However, due to the long consolidation process caused by the ever increasing number of Jews and limited amount of man power, Globocnik finally lost patience and decided that mass execution through shooting would be a better alternative solution for the problem. Therefore, the Einsatzgruppen was tasked to do so and after months of killing, the groups finally evolved into mobile killing units.12

Reinhard Heydrich as SS-Gruppenführer in 1940, photo taken by Heinrich Hoffmann | Courtesy of Blogspot

With Germany’s invasion of Poland in 1939, and subsequently of France, Denmark, Norway, and Greece in 1940, and then of the Soviet Union in 1941, approximately 15 million Jews fell under German control. Due to the extent of the very public mass murders of the Einsatzgruppen in Poland and then in the Soviet Union, a fear came to Heydrich’s mind, which was shared by many of his officers in the field. They believed that the children who survived the ordeal would someday seek revenge. Jewish women would bear more children, and the elderly would tell the tales of the murders of the Einsatzgruppen to future generations. Germany’s past misfortune could end only by means of a terrible final reckoning. Heydrich wanted to ensure that the next generations of Germans would no longer have to deal with any problems related to Jews or future “generations of avengers.” Heydrich left no documents or letters indicating that he felt moral ambiguity about his central role in the murderous escalation of anti-Jewish policies.13

The result of the increased violence was staggering. By the end of 1941, the Einsatzgruppen and their local helpers murdered between 500,000 to 800,000 Jewish men, women, and children in the former Polish and Soviet territories, most of the deaths as a result of shooting at close quarters. By the late summer of 1941, both Himmler and Heydrich became concerned that the face-to-face killings carried out by the Einsatzgruppen threatened the mental health of their men. Himmler worried that it would create sadistic, psychologically deranged killers that would threaten the safety of German society after the war.14 Perhaps there might be a less messy method of murder than the methods of the Einsatzgruppen, one that got the job done, without leaving so much evidence of mass murder lying in hundreds of forest clearings.

One of the earliest proposals for dealing with a less messy method came from Rolf Heinz Hoppner, a local official in the General Government of Poland. He proposed the use of gas to accelerate the murder of the Jews. Inspired by the suggestion, Heydrich instructed his officers to investigate the new means of mass murder. In late October 1941, the proposed solution was tested in the form of mobile gas vans at the Sachsenhausen concentration camp near Berlin. Heydrich considered this means of killing more humane, but the gas vans never caught on. The reason was that asphyxiation by carbon monoxide in medium-sized vans was too slow and ultimately no less disturbing than the Einsatzgruppen shootings. They had to wait for their screaming victims to die inside the vans, which took more than fifteen minutes, before they could remove the bodies from the vehicles. The Nazis then continued the search for more effective extermination methods, which led to experiments with a powerful chemical called Zyklon B in Auschwitz.15 However, that was not the first gas experiment conducted by the Nazis. Back in September 1939, Hitler had established a euthanasia program that played a significant role in the development of the Holocaust. Hitler authorized his personal physician, Karl Brandt, to kill those Germans who were mentally retarded, physically infirm, and chronically ill.16 On January 4, 1940, a gassing experiment was conducted in Brandenburg an der Havel at a prison that was converted into a unit for the euthanasia program. The victims were brought to a pretend shower room with fake water pipes along the ceiling where they were asked to undress, stating that they needed a shower. Once they were secured in the room, gas from bottles of carbon monoxide was released into the room and suffocated the victims. The bodies were then taken away to be burnt after the room was ventilated.17

Since the summer and autumn of 1941, the challenge to find a comprehensive solution to the Jewish question multiplied. Rumors about the atrocities that the Nazis were committing on the Jews in the east soon created anxiety for the Nazi leaders, and Heydrich was forced to urge his men to operate with greater caution and secrecy in their tasks. Heydrich proposed to remove the Jews completely from German-occupied Europe, but the propsal was rejected by Hitler at first, due to the importance of public opinion; however, it was later adopted due to Hitler’s fear of the “Jewish World Conspiracy” after the ever increasing number of Jews that came under German control.18 The deportation of Jews towards the gassing facilities was considered a temporary solution and the gassing or shooting of the Jews in Poland had yet to solve the Jewish question for the millions of Jews throughout Europe. For the purpose of dealing with the magnitude of the problem, Heydrich organized a conference, the Wannsee Conference, which was to be held in a villa on the shores of Berlin’s Lake Wannsee. The meeting was supposed to be held on December 9, 1941, but was postponed to January 20, 1942, due to Germany’s declaration of war on the United States.19 Most of the attendees that Heydrich invited were important and well-educated men, many of whom had equivalent status to Heydrich.20 Heydrich hoped to achieve three goals at the meeting. First, he sought official endorsement from the civil authorities present for the meeting for the deportation process of all Jews throughout Europe, to be rounded up and transported by train in railcars to four main death camps in Poland. This was the planned comprehensive solution to the Jewish question. Second, he wanted to emphasize his sole responsibility for the solution of the Jewish Question against the resistance from civilian authorities, mainly from Wilhelm Stuckart of the Interior Ministry. This would enabled him to establish programs without the interference of the authorities who wanted to protect their waning influence from further invasion of the Reich Main Security Office, an organization established by Himmler. Third, he wanted to reach a consensus with the group of people that would be involved in the deportation process, to establish an understanding that half-Jews (Mischlinge) be deported along with full-Jews (Geltungsjuden).21 If these three goals were achieved, it would mean the annihilation of millions of Jews.

The House of the Wannsee Conference, photo by A.Savin in February 12, 2014 | Courtesy of A.Savin, WikiCommons

The meeting fulfilled the first and second goal and affirmed Heydrich’s overall authority in relation to the Final Solution. However, even with the absence of Hitler, no one, not even Heydrich, had the authority to set these decisions in motion without Hitler’s direct approval. However, there would never be any proof that Hitler gave that approval. Hitler certainly didn’t sign any documents relating to the Final Solution. But that was typical of Hitler’s leadership style, to never leave a paper trail leading back to him. All Hitler had to do was to simply give a nod, and that would have been sufficient to set the Final Solution into motion. The discussion at Wannsee testified to the gradually increasing radicalism with which the central authorities of Nazi Germany viewed the Jewish Question. Hitler’s ultimate approval turned the year 1942 into the most horrifying year of systematic mass killings in the history of humankind, and thus, marked the high water mark of the Holocaust.22

  1. Robert Gerwarth, Hitler’s Hangman: The Life of Heydrich (Yale University Press, 2012), 127-128. ↵
  2. Encyclopedia Judaica, 2nd ed, 2007, s.v. “Holocaust: The Events.” ↵
  3. Laurence Rees, The Holocaust: A New History (New York: Public Affairs, 2017), 60. ↵
  4. Laurence Rees, The Holocaust: A New History (New York: Public Affairs, 2017), 61. ↵
  5. Encyclopedia Judaica, 2nd ed, 2007, s.v. “Holocaust: The Events.” ↵
  6. Laurence Rees, The Holocaust: A New History (New York: Public Affairs, 2017), 90-91. ↵
  7. Laurence Rees, The Holocaust: A New History (New York: Public Affairs, 2017), 151-152. ↵
  8. Laurence Rees, The Holocaust: A New History (New York: Public Affairs, 2017), 152-153. ↵
  9. Christopher R. Browning, Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland (Harper Perennial, April 24, 1998), 9. ↵
  10. Europe Since 1914: Encyclopedia of the Age of War and Reconstruction Vol. 2, 2006, s.v. “Einsatzgruppen.” ↵
  11. Christopher R. Browning, Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland (Harper Perennial, April 24, 1998), 99-100. ↵
  12. Christopher R. Browning, Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland (Harper Perennial, April 24, 1998), 49-50, 54. ↵
  13. Robert Gerwarth, Hitler’s Hangman: The Life of Heydrich (Yale University Press, 2012), 198. ↵
  14. Robert Gerwarth, Hitler’s Hangman: The Life of Heydrich (Yale University Press, 2012), 199. ↵
  15. Robert Gerwarth, Hitler’s Hangman: The Life of Heydrich (Yale University Press, 2012), 200. ↵
  16. Encyclopedia Judaica, 2nd ed, 2007, s.v. “Holocaust: The Events.” ↵
  17. Laurence Rees, The Holocaust: A New History (New York: Public Affairs, 2017), 166. ↵
  18. Robert Gerwarth, Hitler’s Hangman: The Life of Heydrich (Yale University Press, 2012), 201-202. ↵
  19. Robert Gerwarth, Hitler’s Hangman: The Life of Heydrich (Yale University Press, 2012), 209. ↵
  20. Robert Gerwarth, Hitler’s Hangman: The Life of Heydrich (Yale University Press, 2012), 210. ↵
  21. Robert Gerwarth, Hitler’s Hangman: The Life of Heydrich (Yale University Press, 2012), 216. ↵
  22. Robert Gerwarth, Hitler’s Hangman: The Life of Heydrich (Yale University Press, 2012), 217. ↵

Tags from the story

  • Einsatzgruppen, Holocaust, Jewish Question, Reinhard Heydrich, The Final Solution

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email
Amelia Hew

Amelia Hew

Hello! I am a International Business Marketing major at St Mary's University in San Antonio. I am also an international student from Malaysia. My passion is reading and gaining new knowledge. I enjoy listening to music and spending time with my friends and family.
Author Portfolio Page

The Execution Of Marie Antoinette: The Last Queen Of France

t eleven in the morning on October 16, 1793, the prison gate of the Conciergerie

Read More »

This Post Has 45 Comments

  1. Alyssa Ramos
    Alyssa Ramos 20 Sep 2020 Reply

    I only learned about the concentration camps and the victims side of the Holocaust. In Dallas, there is a museum that we would go to during 6th grade, and we were able to listen to the story of a Jewish victim. This article gave an insight to the disgusting people who orchestrated this horrific moment in time. It is crazy to learn about the unethical practices being used and the trial and error of Nazi Germany. I didn’t know about Einsatzgruppen, but it was interesting to learn the effects these horrible incidents had on their mental health. I never realized or thought that the Nazis would be concerned with the aftermath.

  2. Avatar
    Camille Kwan 20 Sep 2020 Reply

    This article was very hard to read. I never understood why Hitler created the final solution when his own mother was jewish. I don’t understand why he would mass murder jews in fake showers with gas. They did not seem to do anything wrong and it sounded like they worked harder than anyone else. It was interesting how you pointed out that hitler never left a paper trace which basically meant he was placing the blame on everyone else. I really enjoyed reading about this topic.

  3. Avatar
    Yamel Herrera 19 Sep 2020 Reply

    This was a very informative article that definitely prompted me to reflect on the events leading up to the Holocaust. It is devastating to know that such brutality and discrimination was commonplace in 30’s and 40’s, but it is also terrifying to know that similar ethnocentrism is still alive today. Something interesting that I learned in this article was that when the gas chambers were first being utilized in the 1940 gassing experiment, the Germans went the extra mile as to set the scene to depict a shower room with fake props to make the ordeal less frightening and confuse those condemned to think they were simply about to take a shower. Overall, I thought this was a very good read and I feel as though the article could benefit from also including a personal story of any victim who had first-hand experience in these events.

  4. Avatar
    Jakob Trevino 17 Sep 2020 Reply

    This was a very informative article and I learned more than I have in the past about the holocaust. It is disgusting that people (nazis) followed the diction of Hitler. Yes, he took the country out of an economic depression, but if you could not see that what he was doing with Jewish people was a violation of human rights, then you were part of the problem as well. The holocaust was one of the worst moments in World History.

  5. Avatar
    Aleea Costilla 12 Sep 2020 Reply

    This was a great article illustrating events leading up to the holocaust atrocities. I heard or read about the use of concentration camps under Hitler’s authority, but this article brought insight into the horrific trial and error. In particular, the murders of Einsatzgruppen brought a different perspective of Nazis that was more concerned with the aftermath of the continued practice of shootings, one I had never heard. Overall, I really enjoyed reading such an informative article that was able to expand my knowledge of the Holocaust.

Comments navigation

Previous commentPrevious

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

StMU History Media

A Student Organization of St. Mary's University of San Antonio Texas

Sponsors

  • College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, St. Mary's University
  • Department of History, St. Mary's University
  • Department of Political Science, St. Mary's University
  • Center for Catholic Studies, St. Mary's University

Support Services

  • The Learning Assistance Center, St. Mary's University
  • Louis J. Blume Library Services, St. Mary's University
  • STRIVE Career Center, St. Mary's University
  • Academic Technology Services, St. Mary's University

About

  • About Us
  • Our Authors
  • Our Archive
  • Contacts

© All rights reserved

Twitter
Facebook
Pinterest