Skip to content

featuring historical research, writing, and media at st. mary's university

  • World History

    World History

    Menu
    • World History
    • Pre-Classical History (to 600 BCE)
    • Classical History (600 BCE-600 CE)
    • Post-Classical History (600 CE-1492 CE)
    • Early Modern History (1492-1789)
    • Modern History (1789-1914)
    • Global History (1900-present)

    From the Ancient World

    Prehistoric Life, Medicine, and Its Dangers

    Posted by Ian Mcewen04/16/2021

    From the Modern World

    Rwanda Climbs One Hill After Another, But Can It Politically Transition Without Falling?

    Posted by Raul Colunga04/18/2021

    Regional Histories

    Menu
    • African and African American Studies
    • Latin American Studies
  • US History

    Early America

    Menu
    • US-Three Worlds Meet (to 1620)
    • US-Colonization and Settlement (1585-1763)
    • US-Revolution and the New Nation (1754-1820s)
    • US-Expansion and Reform (1801-1861)
    • US-Civil War & Reconstruction (1850-1877)

    The 1917 Bath Riots: An Untold Story Of The Border

    Posted by Sofia Almanzan02/28/2020

    The One Device: Story of the First iPhone

    Posted by Bruno Lezama12/08/2019

    Bonnie and Clyde's Darkest Hour

    Posted by Sebastian Portilla11/15/2019

    A Hero’s Burden: COVID-19, Mental Health, and the life of Dr. Lorna Breen

    Posted by Jarred Deptawa11/09/2020

    In the Shadows: Undocumented Life and Human Rights Abuses in the U.S.

    Posted by Manuel Rodriguez11/30/2020

    Trump vs The Vote: What Really Happened in the 2016 Election?

    Posted by Kendall Guajardo11/30/2020

    Emmett Till: The Opposite Ends of the Race Spectrum in the South

    Posted by Emmanuel Ewuzie12/10/2019

    Silicon: the building block of technology

    Posted by Regina De La Parra11/08/2020

    Like a Virgin: Madonna's Road to Success

    Posted by Andrea Degollado11/14/2019

    The Duchess of Windsor—How the IRS Helped Create Same Gender Marriage

    Posted by Christopher Metta Bexar04/07/2019

    Bad Boys vs. Archangels - Adapting and Overcoming the 'Jordan Rules'

    Posted by Stephen Talik04/17/2020

    Olympian Aly Raisman: More than a Survivor, an Advocate!

    Posted by Ashley Martinez11/15/2019

    A Duel That Left No Victor

    Posted by Nathan Alba05/05/2020

    Bullying gone Technological: The Tragic Death of Megan Meier

    Posted by Arsema Abera03/29/2020

    Jerry Jones and the Rise of America's Team

    Posted by Juan Arceo11/07/2019

    On the Road Again: Charlotte Kahl's Journey Along the Old Spanish Trail

    Posted by Gabriel Cohen05/10/2019

    The Enola Gay Dropping A Big ol' A-Bomb: The Start of the Nuclear Age

    Posted by Destiny Lucero05/06/2020

    Tyson McGuffin: US Open Pickleball Champion

    Posted by Jake Faryniarz11/13/2020

    Hugs Not Walls: Reunification of Families on the South Border

    Posted by Eliane Castorena05/07/2020

    Private Felix E. Longoria: An Affair, Some Would Rather Not Remember!

    Posted by Lulu Guadalupe Avitua-Uviedo09/20/2020

    A Charlie Brown Debut: Introduction to the First 'Peanuts' Member of Color

    Posted by Rebeca Escobar04/02/2019

    Mendez v. Westminster: Planting the seed for Desegregation

    Posted by Erin Vento11/10/2020

    The Impossible Record: The Legend Behind Babe Ruth's 1927 Season

    Posted by Jake Mares10/31/2019

    World's Best Boss: Steve Carell and His Journey to Becoming Michael Scott

    Posted by Cristianna Tovar12/10/2019

    "You have the right to an attorney..." or Not

    Posted by Kacey Diaz03/06/2020

    Gun Violence in America: The Sandy Hook Story

    Posted by Diamond Estrada11/14/2019

    The Political Involvement of Twitter

    Posted by Janie Cheverie11/01/2020

    The Prosecutor Who Took On The Dream Team

    Posted by Ariana Brown11/26/2019

    From Being a Christian and Ex-Military to being a Serial Killer: Israel Keyes

    Posted by Adrianna Hernandez10/31/2020

    Music from the heart: How Heart influenced rock and roll

    Posted by Michael Hinojosa05/06/2019

    Contemporary America

    Menu
    • US-Industrial United States (1870-1900)
    • US-Emergence of Modern America (1890-1930)
    • US-Great Depression & WWII (1929-1945)
    • US-Postwar United States (1945-early 1970s)
    • US-Contemporary United States (1968-present)
  • Themes

    SPICE Categories

    Specialty Categories

    Special Themes

    Menu
    • Social History
    • Political History
    • Environmental History
    • Cultural History
    • Economic History
    Menu
    • Art History
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Gender Studies
    • Human Rights
    • Public Health and Medicine
    • International Relations
    • Linguistics
    Menu
    • Military History
    • Music
    • People
    • Psychology
    • Religion
    • Science & Technology
    • Sports
    Menu
    • Catholic Heritage
    • The Year 1968
    • COVID-19
    • Social Justice
    • Spanish Language
  • Showcase

    Showcase Editions

    • Vol 1 – 2016
      • Vol 1 No 1 Aug-Sep 2016
      • Vol 1 No 2 Oct-Nov 2016
    • Vol 2 – 2017
      • Vol 2 No 1 Jan-Feb 2017
      • Vol 2 No 2 Mar-Apr 2017
      • Vol 2 No 3 Aug-Sep 2017
      • Vol 2 No 4 Oct-Nov 2017
    • Vol 3 – 2018
      • Vol 3 No 1 Jan-Feb 2018
      • Vol 3 No 2 Mar-Apr 2018
      • Vol 3 No 3 Aug-Sep 2018
      • Vol 3 No 4 Oct-Nov 2018
    • Vol 4 – 2019
      • Vol 4 No 1 Jan-Feb 2019
      • Vol 4 No 2 Mar-Apr 2019
      • Vol 4 No 3 Aug-Sep 2019
      • Vol 4 No 4 Oct-Nov 2019
    • Vol 5 – 2020
      • Vol 5 No 1 Jan-Feb 2020
      • Vol 5 No 2 Mar-Apr 2020
      • Vol 5 No 3 Aug-Sep 2020
    Menu
    • Vol 1 – 2016
      • Vol 1 No 1 Aug-Sep 2016
      • Vol 1 No 2 Oct-Nov 2016
    • Vol 2 – 2017
      • Vol 2 No 1 Jan-Feb 2017
      • Vol 2 No 2 Mar-Apr 2017
      • Vol 2 No 3 Aug-Sep 2017
      • Vol 2 No 4 Oct-Nov 2017
    • Vol 3 – 2018
      • Vol 3 No 1 Jan-Feb 2018
      • Vol 3 No 2 Mar-Apr 2018
      • Vol 3 No 3 Aug-Sep 2018
      • Vol 3 No 4 Oct-Nov 2018
    • Vol 4 – 2019
      • Vol 4 No 1 Jan-Feb 2019
      • Vol 4 No 2 Mar-Apr 2019
      • Vol 4 No 3 Aug-Sep 2019
      • Vol 4 No 4 Oct-Nov 2019
    • Vol 5 – 2020
      • Vol 5 No 1 Jan-Feb 2020
      • Vol 5 No 2 Mar-Apr 2020
      • Vol 5 No 3 Aug-Sep 2020
  • About

    Course Readings

    Article Indexes

    About Us

    Menu
    • Course Readings – SC 3300 – Nash
    • Course Readings – SMC 1301 – Wieck
    • Course Readings – PO 4334 – Dr Celine
    • Course Readings _ PO 3365 – Dr Celine
    Menu
    • Course Readings – HS 2321 – Whitener
    • Course Readings – HS 2322 – Whitener
    • Course Readings – SMC 1301 – Whitener
    Menu
    • Our Article/Author Index
    • Award Winning Articles
    Menu
    • Our StMU History Media Project
    • Our Faculty Consultants
    • Our Writers
    • Contact Us
  • Descriptive Article, People, Political History, United States History, US-Expansion and Reform (1801-1861), US-Revolution and the New Nation (1754-1820s)
  • May 5, 2020

A Duel That Left No Victor

Duel Between Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton | Sketch by Henry Davenport Northrop, 1901 | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Duel Between Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton | Sketch by Henry Davenport Northrop, 1901 | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Nathan Alba

Nathan Alba

United States history is filled with dramatic events and time periods correlating to the vast, wild, and sometimes reckless founding and expansion of Europeans fleeing tyranny in search of freedom. When one thinks about duels now, one may recall the Wild West, which was an aggressive time period where expanding territories remained somewhat lawless. But what if I told you the most infamous duel in US history never took place in any of the Wild West territories, where cowboys carried six-shooters on their hip. No, the most infamous duel in US history took place on a sacred dueling ground known as Weehawken, New Jersey, and was conducted by two Founding Fathers.

I think people tend to forget why the Revolutionary War was fought and the fallout the war caused around the world. In retrospect, it wasn’t all that long ago when revolutionaries decided to fight against tyranny and misrepresentation (of which oppressed people still fight against today). However, U.S. history is far more complex than the Declaration of Independence and the Revolutionary War. After freedom was won, the former colonists were faced with the problem of trying to govern themselves freely. For how can a country have both order and freedom? The ideals seemingly contradict each other, and this is the problem early U.S. politicians had to resolve if they were to create a country stable enough to withstand the test of time. The U.S. needed a strong enough government to protect the liberty of its citizens and maintain some sense of order in the new free world, and on June 21, 1788 the Constitution of the United States was ratified and adopted as the framework to allow the U.S. to govern itself. 1 And yet still, the U.S. was barely getting its legs underneath it. With a newly founded Republic of such size, the U.S. tested unknown waters and challenging social systems that emphasized order culminating with one ruler, one ideology, and a single representative to lead the people. The U.S. established a system that allowed the people to choose their leader, while still practicing their own free beliefs and individual ways of life.

To be a scholar and politician during the early Republic meant that one could possibly play a large role in molding the foundation that would become the United States we know today. Alexander Hamilton, the man on the twenty-dollar bill, was one of these exceptional characters who played a role in developing the United States. Hamilton was born in the British West Indies and orphaned as a child, yet he went on to become the United States’ first Secretary of Treasury in George Washington’s cabinet. He, along with James Madison and John Jay, earlier authored a series of essays then published in newspaper articles detailing their interpretation and counter-arguments to the stances of Anti-Federalist critiques of the Constitution.2 Hamilton also fought in the Revolutionary War, was a delegate that signed the Constitution, and worked with George Washington directly during his presidency. Hamilton helped to establish the U.S. National Bank along with many other accomplishments. This is not to say that he was entirely the most liked, especially with his longtime battle against rival Aaron Burr. Much like Hamilton, Burr was also a respected figure, who also fought in the war alongside George Washington.3 He was also a politician, but most importantly, he lived in New York. Why is this important? Because Hamilton’s rival also lived in New York and they shared plenty of encounters leading up to their fateful morning.

Bronze Statue of Alexander Hamilton by James Earle Fraser, dedicated on May 17th, 1923 | Currently located at the U.S. Treasury Building in Washington D.C. | Courtesy of Flickr

One of the most significant instances came during the 1800 Presidential election. Seeing that Burr and his running mate Thomas Jefferson were both awarded the same number of electoral votes—the vote moved to the House of Representatives to elect the next president of the United States. Alexander Hamilton used his immense influence on the representatives voting to elect Jefferson over Burr. This would be a major blow to Aaron Burr as Jefferson would go onto win the Presidency. Three years into Jefferson’s first term, Jefferson decided to drop Vice President Aaron Burr from his ticket when he runs for reelection. After finding this out, Burr looked for other ways to regain political power. Burr saw an opportunity to be potential presidential candidate in the years following—and in order to do so he ran for the position of New York Governor in 1804 to try and remain within the political elite. In the months leading up to election, newspapers had been publishing critiques of Burr’s character, calling him a “dangerous” man. These words came from none other than Alexander Hamilton, who was still quite relevant and respected for his character and honor. The result of his smear campaign was that Burr lost the election for governor by a large margin to a lesser known candidate, Morgan Lewis, causing animosity to spike in Burr’s eyes.4 Burr had fought in the revolutionary war alongside George Washington. Burr was a war hero, a lawyer, and a founding father, but his humiliating loss in the New York Governor race never left him peace. He felt cheated, smeared, and belittled. He was not going to let his character be slandered by Hamilton’s words, which caused him to write a series of letters to Hamilton asking that he publicly recant his statement about Burr.5 Hamilton refused accordingly, and through a series of letters between the two individuals, the stage was set for arguably the most infamous duel in American history. There was no other way to settle their dispute, and when one’s honor was called into question there is only one appropriate way to settle such a case. Duels were illegal at the time, but this did not seem to stop men of honor from participating. Under such pretense, the two men had agreed to an honorable duel on the sacred dueling grounds of Weehawken, New Jersey on July 11, 1804.

On the early morning of July 11, the two men, accompanied by their “seconds” or trusted person responsible for negotiating duels according to Code Duello, rowed across the Hudson River to the soggy marsh of Weehawken, New Jersey. It was there where both parties met, unable to resolve their issues with words, and they went forward with the duel. Each took their pistol, loaded, and marched 10 paces away, then turned to face each other, to which the “Present!” call was given… What is known is that Hamilton fired first, and missed. Burr followed with his shot, striking Hamilton in the abdomen, a fatal wound. It is important to address the speculation regarding Hamilton’s intent on dueling with Aaron Burr. He allegedly foretold that he would purposely miss his shot at Burr. This is not to say that Hamilton believed that the two would both leave alive—with their issues resolved. No, Hamilton drafted his will and wrote letters to his family members, should anything happen to him.6 ­­­Burr’s shot struck Hamilton in the abdomen, piercing his liver, and lodging in Hamilton’s spine. Aaron Burr had won. Regardless of whether Hamilton was attempting to take Burr’s life, Hamilton missed his shot. Burr did not. Hamilton was rowed back across the Hudson and die slowly over the next day, surrounded by his family at his Manhattan residence.7

Some may find it confusing, that one could partake in a duel over mere words. But remember at the time, honor largely fueled credibility. And on the other hand, it was seen as cowardice to refuse a duel. Alexander Hamilton was no coward and subsequently accepted Burr’s challenge. Who knows, there have even been theories stating Hamilton actually wished to die. The site of the Burr-Hamilton duel was also the site where Hamilton’s son died—partaking in a duel one year prior to the Hamilton-Burr Duel. Maybe it was fate. Maybe it was where Hamilton wished to end his life, in the same place and fashion in which he lost his son. But these are only speculative questions raised after the death of Hamilton. And yet, the story does not end there, because this is not entirely a story of life and death, but rather a story about revenge.

Aaron Burr Self Portrait | Oil on Canvas by John Vanderlyn, 1802 | Currently located in the National Gallery of Art in Washington D.C. | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

It can be said that Burr was obsessive, driven to such lengths just to be on the receiving end of political power. It was Burr who challenged Hamilton, because to Burr, Hamilton was an enemy preventing Burr from success! Burr refused to accept the subjective comments made by Alexander Hamilton. Burr had climbed the political ladder and was so close to the Presidency. Burr may have seen his own greed as passion, to go down in history as the man whose ambitions were thwarted by his obscure sense of responsibility. Burr may have unknowingly crossed the fine line that divides passion and obsession to the point where he killed the man who preyed on his downfall. But in that same sense, how was a man to act at that time when faced with such an issue? Burr was also a war hero! A man who was willing to die for the sake of freedom, a man who dedicated his life to liberty! A man who believed in free speech, but also the fact that free speech comes with consequences. Burr was not afraid to die for something he believed in. Perhaps if the duel had taken place some ten to fifteen years prior, it may have been less significant in United States history; but the war was over. Freedom had defeated tyranny, and the new age was to live out that freedom, not to continue bloodshed.

Alexander Hamilton Self Portrait | Oil on Canvas by John Trumbull, 1804 | Currently located in the National Portrait Gallery in Washington D.C. | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

On the other hand, Hamilton knew politically he had to accept the duel. He would otherwise be seen as a coward if he did not, and he would lose all credibility if he recanted his comments criticizing Burr. But he also knew that Burr would face backlash if he killed Hamilton, and this is exactly what happened. After Burr killed Hamilton, he faced animosity from the public for killing Hamilton, and he fled South to avoid murder charges. This was not the welcoming that Burr expected for defending himself against a man who had made such egregious claims against him. And with the death of Hamilton marks the inevitable death of Burr’s political career. Perhaps Burr made the wrong move by taking this rivalry too far, but one mistake is all it takes to end one’s life, whether it be figuratively or literally. The rivalry that fueled two men to bring forth such passion in hopes of creating a more perfect Union eventually succumbed to the “death” of both men. While Hamilton lost his life, Burr killed his political career—leading towards a downward spiral before his eventual death in 1836.8

Alexander Hamilton let out his final breaths surrounded by his family, dying 36 hours after the duel. He was remembered as a war hero, a scholar, an example of a true American. Born overseas and orphaned, Hamilton worked tirelessly and lived to become a wealthy man— a fine representation of what is now considered the American Dream. Hamilton came from nothing and died a Founding Father whose work was revered and essential to forming the building blocks of the newly founded United States. He was a man who was willing to die for free speech and wound up doing exactly that—a  tragic end to the lives of two honorable men who were essential in establishing the country we now call home. Both men were responsible for conducting a duel, and both would pay for their participation. It is in fact honorable that both men would die for their beliefs and opinions, but at the cost of their own lives is a tragedy indeed. Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton, two men who would compete until the very end defending their honor. But in their final battle, both would lose.

 

“Never do today what you can put off till tomorrow. Delay may give clearer light as to what is best to be done”

-Aaron Burr

 

“I have thought it my duty to exhibit things as they are, not as they ought to be.”

-Alexander Hamilton

  1. John R. Vile, The Writing and Ratification of the U.S. Constitution: Practical Virtue in Action (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2012) 171-174. ↵
  2. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay, The Federalist Papers (New York: Bantam, 1982). ↵
  3. Teri Kanefield, Alexander Hamilton: The Making of America (New York: Abrams Books for Young Readers, 2017). ↵
  4.  Thomas N. Baker, “‘An Attack Well Directed’ Aaron Burr Intrigues for the Presidency,” Journal of the Early Republic 31, no. 4 (Winter 2011): 553-54. ↵
  5. To Alexander Hamilton from Aaron Burr, 22 June 1804, Founders Online, National Archives, https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Hamilton/01-26-02-0001-0212. Original source: The Papers of Alexander Hamilton, vol. 26, 1 May 1802 – 23 October 1804, Additional Documents 1774–1799, Addenda and Errata, ed. Harold C. Syrett (New York: Columbia University Press, 1979),  255–256. ↵
  6. To Alexander Hamilton from Aaron Burr, 22 June 1804, Founders Online, National Archives, https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Hamilton/01-26-02-0001-0212. Original source: The Papers of Alexander Hamilton, vol. 26, 1 May 1802 – 23 October 1804, Additional Documents 1774–1799, Addenda and Errata, ed. Harold C. Syrett (New York: Columbia University Press, 1979),  293. ↵
  7. Thomas Fleming, “Duel,” in Alexander Hamilton, Aaron Burr and the Future of America (New York, NY: Perseus Books, 1999), 333. ↵
  8. Thomas Fleming, “Duel,” in Alexander Hamilton, Aaron Burr and the Future of America (New York, NY: Perseus Books, 1999), 400-406. ↵

Tags from the story

  • Aaron Burr, Alexander Hamilton

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email
Nathan Alba

Nathan Alba

Author Portfolio Page

The Second Leap For Mankind: The “Buzz” Aldrin Story

July 20, 1969—a day that would go down in history, as the first humans went

Read More »

This Post Has 16 Comments

  1. Azariel Del Carmen
    Azariel Del Carmen 24 Jan 2021 Reply

    While the article had minor errors, I would say it had helped explained more of the outcome from the Hamilton-Burr duel that history books have stated from what we knew till now. This kind of behavior is to be expected back in this time period and somewhat holds true today but of course we aren’t doing much of that now in the 21st century to defend one’s position. However given the circumstances between both parties I can agree that neither party was gonna win the duel cleanly, either what happened to Burr or Hamilton’s reception if he decided to just shoot Burr and have him dead. It also explains a bit of how dueling worked back then and where it took place, what happened and the result from it to which we don’t see much or skim in a regular history class. I believe the article was done pretty well in describing this time in history and brought a bit of new knowledge into what the history of the early US was in elections and such between people.

  2. Carlos Serna
    Carlos Serna 18 Oct 2020 Reply

    I remember in my History class, during high school, my professor tells us about the duel between Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr. It is fascinating how duels were started to being make by individuals long before the Wild West. And more fascinating that one of the first duels was between two founding fathers. Thanks Nathan Alba for writing this article.

  3. Avatar
    Cayden Garcia 4 Oct 2020 Reply

    My first time watching the Broadway show ‘Hamilton’, was the first time I heard about the Hamilton-Burr duel. What I did not know was how much back story and drive Burr had just to be in a position of power. It is crazy to think somebody would be so obsessed with power to the point to take another man’s life. I also find it interesting how there is so much speculation around the duel. It would be strange to think that Hamilton knew what his goal was going into the duel. Maybe grief struck him so hard that he wanted to die in the same spot his son did.

    Good job!

  4. Janaya Felder
    Janaya Felder 18 Sep 2020 Reply

    It’s sad that both of them let their pride lead them to such a bad ending for both of them. They both had consequences of the duel, Hamilton’s life was lost and Burr lost his respect. This article was well written and balanced. Rather than focusing on Hamilton’s side of the story, I appreciated reading Burr’s side as well.

  5. Avatar
    Keily Hart 7 Sep 2020 Reply

    Ive always found Alexander Hamiltons story to be interesting, especially after the release of the musical. Its very weird to think that stubbornness and pride lead to a mans death, especially considering his son defending his pride cost him his life too. This article was captivating and informative. I loved reading it, even though it was about something I already knew about.

  6. Madeline Chandler
    Madeline Chandler 3 Sep 2020 Reply

    This is such a well written engaging article. Very captivating and informative. This historical duel shows such pride, stubbornness, and American leadership. As interesting as it is, it has such an extremely unfortunate ending. Both sides lost in one way or another. I thoroughly enjoyed the perspectives and reasoning behind each of the men’s views that went into such a duel. Job well done! Enjoyed it!

Comments navigation

Previous commentPrevious

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

StMU History Media

A Student Organization of St. Mary's University of San Antonio Texas

Sponsors

  • College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, St. Mary's University
  • Department of History, St. Mary's University
  • Department of Political Science, St. Mary's University
  • Center for Catholic Studies, St. Mary's University

Support Services

  • The Learning Assistance Center, St. Mary's University
  • Louis J. Blume Library Services, St. Mary's University
  • STRIVE Career Center, St. Mary's University
  • Academic Technology Services, St. Mary's University

About

  • About Us
  • Our Authors
  • Our Archive
  • Contacts

© All rights reserved

Twitter
Facebook
Pinterest