Skip to content

featuring historical research, writing, and media at st. mary's university

  • World History

    World History

    Menu
    • World History
    • Pre-Classical History (to 600 BCE)
    • Classical History (600 BCE-600 CE)
    • Post-Classical History (600 CE-1492 CE)
    • Early Modern History (1492-1789)
    • Modern History (1789-1914)
    • Global History (1900-present)

    From the Ancient World

    Prehistoric Life, Medicine, and Its Dangers

    Posted by Ian Mcewen04/16/2021

    From the Modern World

    Rwanda Climbs One Hill After Another, But Can It Politically Transition Without Falling?

    Posted by Raul Colunga04/18/2021

    Regional Histories

    Menu
    • African and African American Studies
    • Latin American Studies
  • US History

    Early America

    Menu
    • US-Three Worlds Meet (to 1620)
    • US-Colonization and Settlement (1585-1763)
    • US-Revolution and the New Nation (1754-1820s)
    • US-Expansion and Reform (1801-1861)
    • US-Civil War & Reconstruction (1850-1877)

    Remembering Ranchos De Las Cabras: The Forgotten Outpost of Mission Espada

    Posted by Shine Trabucco05/07/2019

    America's Greatest Escape: Alcatraz

    Posted by Shea Slusser11/12/2019

    Online Exam Proctoring: The Dark Side of Student Privacy and Health

    Posted by Azariel Del Carmen04/07/2021

    Bryan Stevenson: Justice in the Deep South

    Posted by Bailey Godwin11/05/2020

    Henry Lee Lucas: The Tellings of a Serial Confessor

    Posted by Mia Hernandez03/02/2020

    Brian Kemp, The Puppeteer of His Own Election

    Posted by Alexa Montelongo12/01/2020

    Elvis: The Rise of the Rock and Roll King

    Posted by Alexander Avina12/06/2019

    Jerry Jones and the Rise of America's Team

    Posted by Juan Arceo11/07/2019

    Outlaw Road Racing: Taking the Legendary Cannonball Run at Breakneck Speed

    Posted by Stephen Talik05/01/2020

    MS-13: Origin of the Most Dangerous Gang in the World

    Posted by Juliana Montoya03/06/2020

    The Trials that Started the American Revolution: John Adams

    Posted by Andrea Degollado04/26/2020

    Behind The Tapes: The Actions Taken Towards Impeaching Nixon

    Posted by Thalia Romo11/15/2019

    Diabetes: Don't Sugarcoat It

    Posted by Pablo Medina11/14/2019

    Impaled: The Impossible Story of Phineas Gage

    Posted by Isabella Torres10/01/2019

    Drugs, Alcohol, and Arrests: The Downside to Robert Downey Jr.'s Acting Career

    Posted by Nelly Perez03/02/2020

    The '92 Dream Team: The Team that Changed the Game of Basketball Forever

    Posted by Briley Perkins10/06/2019

    Adrian Vidal: A Tejano Caught Between Two Wars

    Posted by Paul Garza10/22/2019

    Adolfo de Jesus Constanzo and His Satanic Cult

    Posted by Briana Montes11/12/2019

    Fuel for His Pen: The Two Consecutive Plane Accidents of Ernest Hemingway

    Posted by Felipe Macias10/08/2019

    American Enemy? Renouncing Citizenship for Freedom and Enhancing Rights for All Americans

    Posted by Thiffany Yeupell04/16/2020

    Billie Jean King: Ruler of the Court

    Posted by Charli Delmonico12/09/2019

    Walt Disney and the building of his Magic Kingdom

    Posted by Malik Heard12/06/2019

    William Weber: Attorney In it for Profit

    Posted by Makenzie Santana04/17/2019

    The Louisiana Purchase: The Greatest Land Grab In History

    Posted by Joshua Collins04/18/2021

    The Pacification of My Lai

    Posted by Sterling Henarie11/28/2020

    Fyre Festival: Trouble in Paradise

    Posted by Chelsea Alvarez05/12/2019

    The Race for a COVID-19 Vaccine: Is the U.S. Nearing the Finish Line?

    Posted by Ratna Ramaraju11/03/2020

    Soñar Como Sonia

    Posted by Kayla Sultemeier12/02/2020

    Upton Sinclair: His Rise to Fame

    Posted by Gabriella Urrutia11/10/2019

    Walter Cronkite: The Most Trusted Man in America

    Posted by Lesley Martinez04/07/2020

    Contemporary America

    Menu
    • US-Industrial United States (1870-1900)
    • US-Emergence of Modern America (1890-1930)
    • US-Great Depression & WWII (1929-1945)
    • US-Postwar United States (1945-early 1970s)
    • US-Contemporary United States (1968-present)
  • Themes

    SPICE Categories

    Specialty Categories

    Special Themes

    Menu
    • Social History
    • Political History
    • Environmental History
    • Cultural History
    • Economic History
    Menu
    • Art History
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Gender Studies
    • Human Rights
    • Public Health and Medicine
    • International Relations
    • Linguistics
    Menu
    • Military History
    • Music
    • People
    • Psychology
    • Religion
    • Science & Technology
    • Sports
    Menu
    • Catholic Heritage
    • The Year 1968
    • COVID-19
    • Social Justice
    • Spanish Language
  • Showcase

    Showcase Editions

    • Vol 1 – 2016
      • Vol 1 No 1 Aug-Sep 2016
      • Vol 1 No 2 Oct-Nov 2016
    • Vol 2 – 2017
      • Vol 2 No 1 Jan-Feb 2017
      • Vol 2 No 2 Mar-Apr 2017
      • Vol 2 No 3 Aug-Sep 2017
      • Vol 2 No 4 Oct-Nov 2017
    • Vol 3 – 2018
      • Vol 3 No 1 Jan-Feb 2018
      • Vol 3 No 2 Mar-Apr 2018
      • Vol 3 No 3 Aug-Sep 2018
      • Vol 3 No 4 Oct-Nov 2018
    • Vol 4 – 2019
      • Vol 4 No 1 Jan-Feb 2019
      • Vol 4 No 2 Mar-Apr 2019
      • Vol 4 No 3 Aug-Sep 2019
      • Vol 4 No 4 Oct-Nov 2019
    • Vol 5 – 2020
      • Vol 5 No 1 Jan-Feb 2020
      • Vol 5 No 2 Mar-Apr 2020
      • Vol 5 No 3 Aug-Sep 2020
    Menu
    • Vol 1 – 2016
      • Vol 1 No 1 Aug-Sep 2016
      • Vol 1 No 2 Oct-Nov 2016
    • Vol 2 – 2017
      • Vol 2 No 1 Jan-Feb 2017
      • Vol 2 No 2 Mar-Apr 2017
      • Vol 2 No 3 Aug-Sep 2017
      • Vol 2 No 4 Oct-Nov 2017
    • Vol 3 – 2018
      • Vol 3 No 1 Jan-Feb 2018
      • Vol 3 No 2 Mar-Apr 2018
      • Vol 3 No 3 Aug-Sep 2018
      • Vol 3 No 4 Oct-Nov 2018
    • Vol 4 – 2019
      • Vol 4 No 1 Jan-Feb 2019
      • Vol 4 No 2 Mar-Apr 2019
      • Vol 4 No 3 Aug-Sep 2019
      • Vol 4 No 4 Oct-Nov 2019
    • Vol 5 – 2020
      • Vol 5 No 1 Jan-Feb 2020
      • Vol 5 No 2 Mar-Apr 2020
      • Vol 5 No 3 Aug-Sep 2020
  • About

    Course Readings

    Article Indexes

    About Us

    Menu
    • Course Readings – SC 3300 – Nash
    • Course Readings – SMC 1301 – Wieck
    • Course Readings – PO 4334 – Dr Celine
    • Course Readings _ PO 3365 – Dr Celine
    Menu
    • Course Readings – HS 2321 – Whitener
    • Course Readings – HS 2322 – Whitener
    • Course Readings – SMC 1301 – Whitener
    Menu
    • Our Article/Author Index
    • Award Winning Articles
    Menu
    • Our StMU History Media Project
    • Our Faculty Consultants
    • Our Writers
    • Contact Us
  • African and African American Studies, Descriptive Article, Environmental History, Social History, United States History, US-Contemporary United States (1968-present), US-Postwar United States (1945-early 1970s)
  • September 19, 2017

Forty Years of ‘Bad Blood’: The Tuskegee Syphilis Study

Forty Years of ‘Bad Blood’: The Tuskegee Syphilis Study
Amanda Figueroa

Amanda Figueroa

In 1932, the United States Public Health Service (PHS) approved an unethically-conducted syphilis study that involved six hundred poor African-American men at Alabama’s Tuskegee Institute. Many controversial research programs and human trials have been part of the medical field’s history, and scientists with shady ethics have done much harm in the name of science. The government-sponsored Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments, which was able to run for forty very long years, is one of the saddest chapters of that history.

In Macon County, Alabama, there was a very high infection rate of syphilis and very low treatment rates. The Rosenwald Fund, which sought to improve race relations in Macon County, and the United States Public Health Service, joined to address this issue. However, the Great Depression limited the necessary government funding, and the Rosenwald Fund end its support. Nonetheless, the syphilis concern had opened up a pathway for the United States PHS to launch an experiment.1

Subjects talking to nurse Eunice Rivers 1942| Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

The United States PHS had initially intended for the study to last for about seven months, and saw no harm since it was designed as an observational study. They would study the effects from untreated syphilis that had already occurred in a population that was already suffering from high rates of untreated and undiagnosed syphilis. The supposed intention was to draw attention to a neglected public health and medical problem in society. However, the men were misled into the study with the promise of free health care, free transportation to and from hospitals, free hot lunches, and free treatment for their “bad blood,” which was the term used for sicknesses such as anemia, fatigue, and syphilis. Of course, being a minority and living in an area with poor medical attention, many men accepted these benefits being offered in return for their participation in the study. The participants accepted without knowing whether they had syphilis or not. Many accepted without knowing what the disease even was. They actually never knew that they had signed up allow researchers to observe the further deterioration of their health rather than prevent it. In an interview, Mr. Pollard, a participant, said “they sit me down in the chair and the nurse and the doctor got behind and give me the shot…. I stayed in bed ten days or two weeks and the nurse came out there and give me some pills.” Mr. Pollard also mentioned the fact that there was no clinic or hospital in his community. He and other participants would meet under a tree and go into Siloh School. He had continued to participate only because they had told him that he had “bad blood” and that they were supposedly giving him medicine for it, and so he trusted the researchers.2

Doctor injects subject 1942| Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

The U.S. PHS decided to extend the study for five to ten years, to watch the effects of untreated syphilis over time, which they referred to as a “study in nature.” Continuing to mislead the patients, they led those patients to believe that they were continuing to receive medical treatment. However, researchers merely wanted to see the long-term effects of untreated syphilis. The men had to go through several uncomfortable tests and spinal taps, which were very painful and of no benefit to them. The researchers were the only ones who knew what was occurring. When penicillin became the accepted treatment for syphilis in 1945, the men were never offered it nor informed about it. The subjects were never given the alternative of quitting the study after the new, highly effective treatment became widely used. The conditions of the study continued right up to the deaths of the patients. Family members of the deceased patients were required to turn over the corpse for an autopsy in order to secure funeral benefits.

The study continued for forty years, until a public health service investigator raised questions and concerns about the experiment. Peter Buxtun wrote to the director of the U.S. division of venereal diseases about the ethics of the experiment, but the agency ignored him.3 He then in turn leaked information about the study to the Associated Press reporter Jean Heller, who exposed the study. In an interview with Heller, she explains how a letter from Buxtun’s supervisor had told him to ignore his findings on the study and that there was nothing wrong. She believed this is what acknowledged that something wrong was going on. Heller’s story appeared on the front page of the New York Times where everyone learned of this highly unethical study. The study was finally brought to halt, and due to the criticism, the Tuskegee Syphilis Ad Hoc Advisory Panel was formed.4 The panel, composed of nine members, five of them black, concentrated on two issues. First, was the study justified in 1932, and had the men given their informed consent? Second, should penicillin have been provided when it became available in the early 1950s?5 The panel made their claims and pointed out what was unethical; however, the facts they presented were not necessarily true. They claimed how wrong it was to not give treatment to the men, however, the researchers pointed at how their intentions were to only observe the progression of syphilis. Therefore, several doctors involved in the study were easily able to justify the experiment.

Article by Jean Heller 1972 | Courtesy of the New York Times

After forty years, over five hundred of the original participants had already passed, along with some of their wives and even children, who had also contracted syphilis. The families remained quiet and unheard, keeping in silence the anger and shame as well as possible damage to their health. Albert Julkes Jr., whose father was a subject in the study, said, “You get treated like lepers… People think it’s the scourge of the earth to have it in your family.”6 It was an embarrassment to be one related to someone who was a participant in the study because many people would see them as ignorant and thought they didn’t know better.

On July 23, 1973, a class-action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama on behalf of the men in the study. A ten million out-of-court settlement was reached and the U.S. government promised to provide for lifetime medical benefits and burial services to all living participants. Along with that, the Tuskegee Health Benefit Program was established to yield these services. Congress also passed the National Research Act, which was targeted in preventing the exploitation of human subjects by researchers.

As a result of this study, many African Americans developed a fear and mistrust of public health officials, so they would not seek medical attention. To help with the healing, on May 16, 1997, President William J. Clinton gave an apology to the eight remaining survivors of the study done in Tuskegee.

“The United States government did something that was wrong — deeply, profoundly, morally wrong,” Clinton said. “It was an outrage to our commitment to integrity and equality for all our citizens. To the survivors, to the wives and family members, the children and the grandchildren, I say what you know: No power on Earth can give you back the lives lost, the pain suffered, the years of internal torment and anguish. What was done cannot be undone. But we can end the silence. We can stop turning our heads away. We can look at you in the eye and finally say on behalf of the American people, what the United States government did was shameful, and I am sorry.” – President Clinton 7

Many apologies were made to the men still living and their families; however, this does not erase what had occurred for forty years. This experiment was a turning point in the creation of modern bioethics. Many new laws and policies are now in place to ensure that patients are precisely aware of what will be done or administered to them. For example, a television commercial about cough medicine will now have a long list all the possible side effects that can occur from taking it. This is called informed consent, which has been greatly emphasized since this study occurred. Since there was such an emphasis on having ethical studies, the government also halted another study that occurred around the same time in Guatemala. From 1946 to 1948, men and women were purposely infected with syphilis to determine whether penicillin was effective. The results of this study were never published. If the Tuskegee Syphilis study had never occurred, the continuous injustice and unethical experiments would not have come to a halt. It is now more important than ever to make sure that all studies or experiments are done fairly and for all the right reasons.

  1. David Smolin, “The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, Social Change, and the Future of Bioethics,” Faulkner Law Review 3, (Spring 2012): 230. ↵
  2. Susan Reverby, Tuskegee’s truths: rethinking the Tuskegee Syphilis Study (Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press, 2000), 198. ↵
  3. Britt Rusert, “‘A study in Nature’: The Tuskegee Experiments and the New South Plantation,” Journal of Medical Humanities 30, (September 2009): 157. ↵
  4. United States. Tuskegee Syphilis Study Ad Hoc Advisory Panel, Final Report of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study Ad Hoc Advisory Panel (Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, 1973), 108. ↵
  5. Ralph Katz, “The legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study: assessing its impact on willingness to participate in biomedical studies,” Journal of health care for the poor and underserved 19, (2008): 1169. ↵
  6. Carol Yoo, “Families Emerge as Silent Victims of Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment,” The New York Times (May 1997): 2. ↵
  7. USA: President Clinton Apologizes for Syphilis Experiment (Associated Press 1997), video. ↵

Tags from the story

  • Tuskegee Syphilis Study

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email
Amanda Figueroa

Amanda Figueroa

Author Portfolio Page

If there was no animal research, there would be no cure

Many people may not know this, but animal research has played an important role in

Read More »

The Rage of Nina Simone: “Mississippi Goddam”

It is a jaunty ragtime melody that fools listeners into briefly perceiving the number as

Read More »

This Post Has 36 Comments

  1. Avatar
    Cameron Lopez 11 Apr 2019 Reply

    Great article, Its awful what happened to those men and how this can be written off as an ethical experiment. The use of Guinea pigs and purposely infecting them with something they don’t know about is beyond reasonable. Killing people in such a slow and painful way, the tests they went through were like slow torture and pain.

  2. Avatar
    Michael Hinojosa 3 Apr 2019 Reply

    An amazingly well written article about a truly horrific and immoral subject that honestly shocks me with the fact that it was conducted and improved. I don’t believe that this subject can be argued ethically over whether or not it was right or wrong. What happened to those subjects was completely and utterly inhumane and immoral; I pray something like this never happens again.

  3. Avatar
    Hali Garcia 31 Mar 2019 Reply

    Wow what the participants faced was terrible. I cannot believe that this was approved. It is disturbing how the men were not told that they were being injected with syphilis and not even treated. It is even more disturbing how they were told that they would be given free health care, transportation to the hospital, and hot food when in fact they were not.

  4. Christopher Hohman
    Christopher Hohman 21 Mar 2019 Reply

    Nice article. It is terrible what happened to these men who participated in the study. It is just disgusting that scientist and people in general could make their fellow humans suffer so dearly. They should have been given the option to either leave the study or be provided the proper drug for treatment of the disease. It is so sad that an experiment like this went on for so long because it caused so much suffering.

  5. Avatar
    Natalia Flores 9 Apr 2018 Reply

    Terrible that this could be written off as an ethical experiment. Using humans as guinea pigs and purposely infecting them with something they don’t know about is beyond reason. It’s like killing people slowly and painfully. The trials and tests they went through was almost like soft torture only they lie and say “it’ll help you”. It’s disgusting that they had to file a lawsuit in order to get some form of relief from the affects of the experiment.

  6. Avatar
    Cristina Cabello 25 Feb 2018 Reply

    Can this study be ethically debated over right or wrong? I believe that it can go both ways. If things did not happen the way that it did then we would not know the things that we know now. But the people that were hurt during this experiment is terrible. They were never informed that they had syphilis. Then they were never treated. Which is basically man slaughter in my opinion. This is a very interesting topic and I am glad that you wrote about it.

Comments navigation

Previous commentPrevious

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

StMU History Media

A Student Organization of St. Mary's University of San Antonio Texas

Sponsors

  • College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, St. Mary's University
  • Department of History, St. Mary's University
  • Department of Political Science, St. Mary's University
  • Center for Catholic Studies, St. Mary's University

Support Services

  • The Learning Assistance Center, St. Mary's University
  • Louis J. Blume Library Services, St. Mary's University
  • STRIVE Career Center, St. Mary's University
  • Academic Technology Services, St. Mary's University

About

  • About Us
  • Our Authors
  • Our Archive
  • Contacts

© All rights reserved

Twitter
Facebook
Pinterest