Skip to content

featuring historical research, writing, and media at st. mary's university

  • World History

    World History

    Menu
    • World History
    • Pre-Classical History (to 600 BCE)
    • Classical History (600 BCE-600 CE)
    • Post-Classical History (600 CE-1492 CE)
    • Early Modern History (1492-1789)
    • Modern History (1789-1914)
    • Global History (1900-present)

    From the Ancient World

    The Battle of Zama: Rome's Vengeance

    Posted by Davis Nickle12/01/2020

    From the Modern World

    The Holy See Takes On The Fight Against Climate Change

    Posted by Victor Rodriguez11/30/2020

    Regional Histories

    Menu
    • African and African American Studies
    • Latin American Studies
  • US History

    Early America

    Menu
    • US-Three Worlds Meet (to 1620)
    • US-Colonization and Settlement (1585-1763)
    • US-Revolution and the New Nation (1754-1820s)
    • US-Expansion and Reform (1801-1861)
    • US-Civil War & Reconstruction (1850-1877)

    The Shock Heard Around The World: Milgram's Experiment

    Posted by Ava Rodriguez05/10/2019

    Henry Lee Lucas: The Tellings of a Serial Confessor

    Posted by Mia Hernandez03/02/2020

    Stitches of Healing: The AIDS Memorial Quilt

    Posted by Michaela Jeanis11/05/2020

    On the Road Again: Charlotte Kahl's Journey Along the Old Spanish Trail

    Posted by Gabriel Cohen05/10/2019

    Feeding Students' Mind and Body: When Education Means Providing Meals

    Posted by Yamel Herrera10/30/2020

    ROOTS: A Cultural Phenomenon

    Posted by Alicia Guzman05/13/2019

    Mark Zuckerberg: How a CEO went from Anxious to Greatness

    Posted by Alexandria Wicker11/23/2020

    Five Eyes & An Onion: Tor & the Deep Dark Web

    Posted by Stephen Talik04/08/2020

    ¿Inglés sin barreras? Cómo Contribuye el Lenguaje de Internet a la Brecha Digital

    Posted by Felicia Cruz11/10/2020

    The Untold Fight of Muhammad Ali: The Strength Behind Each Punch

    Posted by Audrey Uribe12/13/2019

    There's No Place Like Home, In Hollywood: The Story Behind Judy Garland

    Posted by Audrey Uribe10/31/2019

    Remembering Ranchos De Las Cabras: The Forgotten Outpost of Mission Espada

    Posted by Shine Trabucco05/07/2019

    Thomas Gallaudet: The Voice of the Deaf

    Posted by Yazmin Garza04/06/2019

    The First Social Distancing: Examining the 1995 Heat Wave of Chicago From a Social Perspective

    Posted by Tavion Varela11/09/2020

    Why We Should Defend Human Gene Editing

    Posted by Emily Velazquez04/07/2019

    The Exorcism of Roland Doe

    Posted by Mitchell Yocham12/05/2019

    Trump vs The Vote: What Really Happened in the 2016 Election?

    Posted by Kendall Guajardo11/30/2020

    Bonnie and Clyde's Darkest Hour

    Posted by Sebastian Portilla11/15/2019

    The Notorious RBG

    Posted by Alicia Guzman04/07/2019

    Where Will it Lead (Pb) Us from Here: A Global Necessity or a Disaster Waiting to Happen?

    Posted by Midori Flores11/18/2020

    The Trials that Started the American Revolution: John Adams

    Posted by Andrea Degollado04/26/2020

    Elizabeth Taylor the Vixen Savior

    Posted by Micheala Whitfield05/04/2020

    Breaking Silence or Just Speaking Louder?: The Story of Larry Nassar and his 499 Victims

    Posted by Paola Arellano04/07/2019

    The Courageous Work of Americo Paredes

    Posted by Anthony Coronado05/06/2020

    Can We All Get Along?: The Fight Against Police Brutality

    Posted by Lindsey Ogle11/23/2020

    America's Greatest Escape: Alcatraz

    Posted by Shea Slusser11/12/2019

    Music from the heart: How Heart influenced rock and roll

    Posted by Michael Hinojosa05/06/2019

    To Love A Serial Killer

    Posted by Krystal Rodriguez04/17/2019

    "You have the right to an attorney..." or Not

    Posted by Kacey Diaz03/06/2020

    Brian Kemp, The Puppeteer of His Own Election

    Posted by Alexa Montelongo12/01/2020

    Contemporary America

    Menu
    • US-Industrial United States (1870-1900)
    • US-Emergence of Modern America (1890-1930)
    • US-Great Depression & WWII (1929-1945)
    • US-Postwar United States (1945-early 1970s)
    • US-Contemporary United States (1968-present)
  • Themes

    SPICE Categories

    Specialty Categories

    Special Themes

    Menu
    • Social History
    • Political History
    • Environmental History
    • Cultural History
    • Economic History
    Menu
    • Art History
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Gender Studies
    • Human Rights
    • Public Health and Medicine
    • International Relations
    • Linguistics
    Menu
    • Military History
    • Music
    • People
    • Psychology
    • Religion
    • Science & Technology
    • Sports
    Menu
    • Catholic Heritage
    • The Year 1968
    • COVID-19
    • Social Justice
    • Spanish Language
  • Showcase

    Showcase Editions

    • Vol 1 – 2016
      • Vol 1 No 1 Aug-Sep 2016
      • Vol 1 No 2 Oct-Nov 2016
    • Vol 2 – 2017
      • Vol 2 No 1 Jan-Feb 2017
      • Vol 2 No 2 Mar-Apr 2017
      • Vol 2 No 3 Aug-Sep 2017
      • Vol 2 No 4 Oct-Nov 2017
    • Vol 3 – 2018
      • Vol 3 No 1 Jan-Feb 2018
      • Vol 3 No 2 Mar-Apr 2018
      • Vol 3 No 3 Aug-Sep 2018
      • Vol 3 No 4 Oct-Nov 2018
    • Vol 4 – 2019
      • Vol 4 No 1 Jan-Feb 2019
      • Vol 4 No 2 Mar-Apr 2019
      • Vol 4 No 3 Aug-Sep 2019
      • Vol 4 No 4 Oct-Nov 2019
    • Vol 5 – 2020
      • Vol 5 No 1 Jan-Feb 2020
      • Vol 5 No 2 Mar-Apr 2020
      • Vol 5 No 3 Aug-Sep 2020
    Menu
    • Vol 1 – 2016
      • Vol 1 No 1 Aug-Sep 2016
      • Vol 1 No 2 Oct-Nov 2016
    • Vol 2 – 2017
      • Vol 2 No 1 Jan-Feb 2017
      • Vol 2 No 2 Mar-Apr 2017
      • Vol 2 No 3 Aug-Sep 2017
      • Vol 2 No 4 Oct-Nov 2017
    • Vol 3 – 2018
      • Vol 3 No 1 Jan-Feb 2018
      • Vol 3 No 2 Mar-Apr 2018
      • Vol 3 No 3 Aug-Sep 2018
      • Vol 3 No 4 Oct-Nov 2018
    • Vol 4 – 2019
      • Vol 4 No 1 Jan-Feb 2019
      • Vol 4 No 2 Mar-Apr 2019
      • Vol 4 No 3 Aug-Sep 2019
      • Vol 4 No 4 Oct-Nov 2019
    • Vol 5 – 2020
      • Vol 5 No 1 Jan-Feb 2020
      • Vol 5 No 2 Mar-Apr 2020
      • Vol 5 No 3 Aug-Sep 2020
  • About

    Course Readings

    Article Indexes

    About Us

    Menu
    • Course Readings – SC 3300 – Nash
    • Course Readings – SMC 1301 – Wieck
    • Course Readings – PO 4334 – Dr Celine
    • Course Readings _ PO 3365 – Dr Celine
    Menu
    • Course Readings – HS 2321 – Whitener
    • Course Readings – HS 2322 – Whitener
    • Course Readings – SMC 1301 – Whitener
    Menu
    • Our Article/Author Index
    • Award Winning Articles
    Menu
    • Our StMU History Media Project
    • Our Faculty Consultants
    • Our Writers
    • Contact Us
  • Business, Cultural History, Descriptive Article, United States History, US-Postwar United States (1945-early 1970s)
  • December 10, 2017

“For Man’s Flavor Come to Marlboro Country.” The Marlboro Man and its Advertising Success

Marlboro Man Darrell Winfield| Courtesy of Advertising Archives
Marlboro Man Darrell Winfield| Courtesy of Advertising Archives
Josselyn Arrieta-Meraz

Josselyn Arrieta-Meraz

“The Marlboro Man is dead” read the morning headline once again. Eric Lawson became the fourth “Marlboro man” in a row to die from a smoking-related disease. Aside from Lawson’s sad death, what made this international news? For two decades, the “Marlboro Woman” had been the marketing image for the filtered cigarette brand Marlboro for the Philip Morris Tobacco Company. That changed in the 1950s. Marlboro came to be associated with more than just “the flapper” of the 1920s, or the “classy lady” of the 1940s. Why limit the brand to women? By replacing the feminine imagery with masculine characters, men might start buying filtered cigarettes; but would they? Would they buy a cigarette that was made for women? In fact, they did, thanks to the new advertising campaign put together in the early 1950s, one of the most successful advertising campaigns in advertising history. This is the story of the Marlboro man.

1930’s Marlboro Advertisement| Courtesy of Advertising Archives

Marlboro was a brand of filtered cigarettes created in 1924 targeting young women consumers. Marlboro cigarettes were marketed as being “safer” due to their filters; they were light cigarettes, “Mild as May,” sold in white boxes, and accompanied by a red cellulose around the filter to hide lipstick stains, which was very appealing to women. The idea of the Marlboro Woman began to crumble, though, when a report was published in the early 1950s, which prompted an initial 40 percent of Americans to agree that cigarettes were the leading cause of lung cancer. In the early 1950s, the Philip Morris Company, makers of Marlboro cigarettes, made the decision to change the image of their Marlboro brand and target a new market, young males, who were concerned about the dangers of smoking unfiltered cigarettes. Philip Morris and other cigarette manufacturers learned a valuable piece of information during the early 50s; male smoking was still popular, but the dangers of getting lung cancer from smoking led many to seeing filtered cigarettes as somewhat healthier than unfiltered. The sales of filtered cigarettes, like the Marlboro brand, increased, while cigarette brands that were unfiltered saw their sales falter. A new branding could have many advantages. Philip Morris already had a filtered cigarette, meaning that it was only a matter of repositioning the Marlboro brand to appeal to male customers. Not only did men start to buy these filtered cigarettes, but they did so not completely because of the perceived health benefit. They did so because they came to identify with the new branding images associated with it, namely the image of the Marlboro Man. The new packaging and toughness was also targeted to men, who wanted to protect their cigarettes in rough conditions, along with a flip-top that was designed for smokers to look at while taking out a cigarette. Its new and “improved” look was easily recognizable on TV screens, along with the “Marlboro” brand.1

Joining Philip Morris’s advertising team was Leo Burnett, a former newspaper reporter who had moved to Chicago to open his own advertising agency in 1935. This Chicago-based advertising agency was known for being able to target new audiences and craft ad campaigns that emphasized brand image, focusing on the highly visual qualities of products. While both the Leo Burnett Co. and Philip Morris  gathered their thoughts, knowing that they wanted to shift their consumer focus to men, they came up with the idea of presenting the Marlboro brand, not as a health alternative to non-filtered brands, but as a cigarette especially made for rugged archetypal masculine characters. More specifically, they chose the cowboy character as the best and only vehicle for their campaign.2 They had the focus. Now they needed the man who would become the Marlboro Man.

Clarence Hailey Long, first Marlboro Man | Courtesy of Advertising Archives

The initial Marlboro Man is said to have been inspired by the Life Magazine’s publication of Leonard McCombe’s photo essay featuring Clarence Hailey Long. Long, the foreman of the JA Ranch, was catapulted to national attention in 1949, when McCombe’sseries of photographs on ranching in the American West were published. The Texas cowboy was the first model to appear in a Marlboro advertisement. Long would subsequently be followed by other “Marlboro Man” cowboys over the next decade, including Wayne McLaren, Dick Hammer, and Eric Lawson, along with Andy Armstrong who was the ad agency’s art supervisor. Later, there came others, like the director of sales promotion for Philip Morris, Robert Larking, and from the Leo Burnett ad agency, Lee Stanley and Owen Smith.

Quickly, this Marlboro rebranding became one of the most successful in tobacco advertising, indeed in all of advertising. Its impact on sales was immediate. Within a year, the Marlboro brand went from the bottom-tenth to the top-fourth position in the U.S market. By 1972, Marlboro was America’s most popular cigarette brand, a position it still holds to this day.3

Many now ask why this marketing plan worked so well? Why was it so powerful and why does it continue to be powerful in some markets to this day? Many researchers have found that the Marlboro man brings together at least three powerful psychological drives. The first is its use of archetypes. The cowboy from Marlboro Country is a “Warrior and Traveler,” a unique American vision of what a typical Explorer should look like.4 He is what represents a lone traveler, and what many audiences began to feel attracted to. They wanted to be like the Marlboro Man and experience the Marlboro Country. The second psychological drive is visual semiotics, which is the science that analyzes how a sign brings meaning to a reader or a viewer. From the perspective of the The Marlboro Man as a visual, the viewer sees a universal masculinity and values connected to rugged independence and egoism.5 Along with the drive of liberty, which is what most American white men, who were mostly from the middle-class in the 1950s, sought. Marlboro Country itself symbolized a natural and clean world that was not polluted by issues at the time. It was America’s heartland, overlooking large vistas of “America” along with its terrain, which attracted a wide range of audiences and captured Americans’ imagination.

Marlboro Country Advertisement| Courtesy of Advertising Archives

The tough, self-sufficient and hardworking Marlboro Man was one of the most famous ad campaigns. One of the many commercials shows a man getting off a helicopter, arriving to “Marlboro Country.” The commercial is followed by narration by a man who states how there is “always Time for a Marlboro,” while the package image is featured, the men are lighting their cigarettes and enjoying the scenery, giving the viewers a taste of what it is to be like them and “go to where the flavor is.”

The role of advertising agencies were known to have set far-reaching advertising trends in the 1950’s, like establishing a cultural and economic environment at the time. The traditional media consisted of radio, newspapers, and magazines, which remained vital during the early years of the decade. But later, television became the turning point for many advertisers with national media plans. Throughout this decade, advertising expenditures increased to surprising levels. Advertising agency J. Walter Thompson Co., for example, saw its billings rise from $78 million in 1945 to $172 million in 1955, and by 1960, $260 million.6 This was the decade of rising demand for consumer products, such as clothing, automobiles, refrigerators, and other appliances. Marketers continued to offer the “new and improved” products to maintain that high consumer demand. Such marketing drew on a new science of advertising, as seen in motivational research, demographic targeting, and generational marketing. But one, if the most important, factor in influencing advertising in the 1950s was the growth of TV.

1956 Marlboro Advertisement| Courtesy of Advertising Archives

By 1951, live television network services reached the West Coast via microwave transmitters, which established coast to coast national coverage. At the time, television programs would typically promote the name of the sponsor but not the star; for example, “Hallmark Hall of Fame,” “Texaco Star Theater,” “Colgate Comedy Hour.” “Goodyear TV Playhouse” and “Kraft Television Theater” were just a few of the sponsors who were mentioned. Madison Avenue continued to raise profits from the dramatic increase in TV spending. By 1949, TV spending was $12.3 million; after two years it had grown to $128 million. By 1954, TV had become one of the leading media for advertising, while radio suffered losses, since their audiences moved to TV. By the end of 1960, televisions were owned by 90 percent of households.

1950’s USA Marlboro Magazine |Courtesy of Advertising Archives

During the post World War II period, from 1946 until 1964, the overall meaning of a cigarette in American life underwent a significant transformation. Social acceptability of cigarette smoking was reaching historical high points and the rates of consumption were increasing exponentially. During this time, smoking was “cool” and “glamorous.” Hollywood stars like James Dean and Humphrey Bogart were never seen without one. Screen beauties, such as Audrey Hepburn and Marlene Dietrich, made smoking look sophisticated and sensual. So much so that by the late 1950s, around half of the populations of industrialized nations smoked, because the product was cheap, legal, and socially acceptable.7

Some of Hollywood’s biggest names from the 1950’s were appearing in films with cigarettes. The promotion of cigarettes was seen as a sophisticated and healthy task, almost as if it was created for the acting profession. Cigarette makers have had a long history of getting placement of their product in Hollywood. Films such as Breakfast At Tiffany’s, which is a 1961 film that starred Audrey Hepburn and George Peppard, where Hepburn was constantly shown as a chic, long, black cigarette holder. Many other films portrayed the positive image of smoking, which was seen as an object with symbolism, and an instrument that showed power and class, and ultimately accepted by society.

The Marlboro advertising campaign, created by Leo Burnett Co. and Philip Morris Co., is said to be one of the most brilliant advertising campaigns of all time. They turned the product from the slogan “Mild as May” which targeted a feminine lifestyle, into something ruggedly masculine in a matter of months. There was a time when cigarettes were originally sold as expensive handmade luxury goods for the urban elite, but no matter how you may feel about the tobacco industry, one thing is undeniable: cigarette manufacturers employed the best marketers in the business in the 1950s, making this one of the first and best success stories in the history of branding, never allowing us to forget the Marlboro Man and what he declared, “Come to where the flavor is; come to Marlboro Country.”

  1. Cameron White, John L. Oliffe, and Joan L. Bottorff, “From the physician to the marlboro man: Masculinity, health, and Cigarette Advertising in America 1946–1964,” Men and Masculinities 15, no. 5 (December 2012): 527-531. ↵
  2.  Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, March 2017, s.v. “Leo Burnett.” ↵
  3. James L. Hamilton, “The Demand for Cigarettes: Advertising, the Health Scare, and the Cigarette Advertising Ban,” The Review of Economics and Statistics 54, no. 4 (1972): 401-404. ↵
  4.  Ira Teinowitz, “Philip Morris USA rolls Marlboro Milds to national audience,” Advertising Age 71, no. 10 (June 2000): 5-7. ↵
  5. John P. Pierce, Elizabeth A. Gilpin, and Won S. Choi, “Sharing the blame: smoking experimentation and future smoking-attributable mortality due to Joe Camel and Marlboro advertising and promotions,” Tobacco Control no. 1 (1999): 34-37. ↵
  6. Stepháne Pincas and Marc Loiseau, History of advertising (Hong Kong: Los Angeles, 2008), 24-26. ↵
  7. Linda Kulman, Madison Avenue’s Marlboro Man (American Ingenuity, 2004), 76-82. ↵

Tags from the story

  • Marlboro Man, Philip Morris

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email
Josselyn Arrieta-Meraz

Josselyn Arrieta-Meraz

I am a Marketing major at St. Mary’s University in San Antonio, coming from Austin, Texas. My passion is to help others in need. I love to serve and give back to my community, and to meet new people. I enjoy spending my free time with family and friends and with those that I love.
Author Portfolio Page

Cai Lun: The Chinese Inventor of Paper

Have you ever looked at that piece of paper sitting in front of you and

Read More »

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire: A Man-Made Disaster

It was March 25, 1911, in New York City. It was a Saturday afternoon just

Read More »

This Post Has 52 Comments

  1. Avatar
    Ruben Basaldu 14 Apr 2019 Reply

    This article was really interesting to read surprisingly. it is such a shame that marketers were able to grab so many people onto cigarettes but it also just shows you how good those marketers were at there jobs because they were able to get people hooked on their product. I had no idea that back in the day cigarettes were targeted towards women before they would shift over to men. That was interesting to me. I am a little glad that times are changing and more people are not smoking cigarettes as much but I also know that I cannot stop people who feel as if they need a smoke.

  2. Avatar
    Nawaf Almarwaie 7 Mar 2019 Reply

    such an amazing article i did not think in anyway that cigarettes had made to target women, even though i liked the part where they made a red filter to hide lipstick stain. the article shows how the advertisement had a great effect on people especially young men and women, not only that but it really made me laugh when i read about how they were thinking that the filters may reduce the danger that cigarettes cause , moreover, i am wondering what the reaction of people was when they found out that smoking kills a lot of people and consider as one of the main reasons for lung canser.

Comments navigation

Previous commentPrevious

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

StMU History Media

A Student Organization of St. Mary's University of San Antonio Texas

Sponsors

  • College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, St. Mary's University
  • Department of History, St. Mary's University
  • Department of Political Science, St. Mary's University
  • Center for Catholic Studies, St. Mary's University

Support Services

  • The Learning Assistance Center, St. Mary's University
  • Louis J. Blume Library Services, St. Mary's University
  • STRIVE Career Center, St. Mary's University
  • Academic Technology Services, St. Mary's University

About

  • About Us
  • Our Authors
  • Our Archive
  • Contacts

© All rights reserved

Twitter
Facebook
Pinterest