Skip to content

featuring historical research, writing, and media at st. mary's university

  • World History

    World History

    Menu
    • World History
    • Pre-Classical History (to 600 BCE)
    • Classical History (600 BCE-600 CE)
    • Post-Classical History (600 CE-1492 CE)
    • Early Modern History (1492-1789)
    • Modern History (1789-1914)
    • Global History (1900-present)

    From the Ancient World

    The Battle of Zama: Rome's Vengeance

    Posted by Davis Nickle12/01/2020

    From the Modern World

    The Holy See Takes On The Fight Against Climate Change

    Posted by Victor Rodriguez11/30/2020

    Regional Histories

    Menu
    • African and African American Studies
    • Latin American Studies
  • US History

    Early America

    Menu
    • US-Three Worlds Meet (to 1620)
    • US-Colonization and Settlement (1585-1763)
    • US-Revolution and the New Nation (1754-1820s)
    • US-Expansion and Reform (1801-1861)
    • US-Civil War & Reconstruction (1850-1877)

    Was Ted Bundy a Sociopath or a Psychopath?

    Posted by Maria Cossio11/23/2020

    The Artistic Duo: The Inspiring Story of Jean Michel Basquiat and Andy Warhol

    Posted by Nelly Perez10/22/2019

    Murder or “Justifiable Homicide”?: The Death of the Revolutionary Fred Hampton

    Posted by Natalie Thamm04/07/2019

    Mike Nguyen: The Struggle Of a Restaurant Owner During COVID-19

    Posted by Alyssa Ramos10/22/2020

    Five Eyes & An Onion: Tor & the Deep Dark Web

    Posted by Stephen Talik04/08/2020

    Henry Lee Lucas: The Tellings of a Serial Confessor

    Posted by Mia Hernandez03/02/2020

    Nikola Tesla's Tower of Dreams

    Posted by Mark Dominguez11/10/2019

    Say Her Name: Breonna Taylor

    Posted by Shriji Lalji12/02/2020

    Elvis: The Rise of the Rock and Roll King

    Posted by Alexander Avina12/06/2019

    “Find a miracle, hold onto it, and keep going.” The Story of Elizabeth Smart

    Posted by Mia Hernandez11/07/2020

    ¡Si, Se Puede! – Collective Organizing, Unions, and Non Violent Protests

    Posted by Eric Grant11/19/2020

    The Washington Riots: The Fight that Never Stops

    Posted by Judy Reyes11/14/2019

    Behind The Tapes: The Actions Taken Towards Impeaching Nixon

    Posted by Thalia Romo11/15/2019

    Diferencias Generacionales en el Aprendizaje de una Segunda Lengua

    Posted by Monserrat Silva Urbina12/02/2020

    The First Social Distancing: Examining the 1995 Heat Wave of Chicago From a Social Perspective

    Posted by Tavion Varela11/09/2020

    Feeding Students' Mind and Body: When Education Means Providing Meals

    Posted by Yamel Herrera10/30/2020

    Billie Jean King: Ruler of the Court

    Posted by Charli Delmonico12/09/2019

    Hispanophobia: La Discriminación contra las Personas que Hablan Español

    Posted by Cristian Maldonado12/22/2020

    CARELESS: Excluding DACA Recipients from the Covid-19 CARES Act

    Posted by Genesis Vera11/30/2020

    Infamous story of the Beach Boys and Murderous Manic: Charles Manson

    Posted by Mauro Bustamante11/26/2019

    Soñar Como Sonia

    Posted by Kayla Sultemeier12/02/2020

    The Prosecutor Who Took On The Dream Team

    Posted by Ariana Brown11/26/2019

    The Mysterious Death of David Crockett

    Posted by Kenneth Gilley12/13/2019

    A Forgotten Finals: Bill Russell, and the 1966 NBA Finals

    Posted by Kaleb Werku11/12/2019

    Trump vs The Vote: What Really Happened in the 2016 Election?

    Posted by Kendall Guajardo11/30/2020

    The First Girl Scout, Juliette Gordon Low

    Posted by Margaret Maguire12/06/2019

    In the Shadows: Undocumented Life and Human Rights Abuses in the U.S.

    Posted by Manuel Rodriguez11/30/2020

    The Inevitable Fall of Bernie Madoff’s $65 Billion Scheme

    Posted by Nicholas Burch12/02/2020

    ADHD Among Americans: From Childhood to Adulthood

    Posted by Josephine Tran11/15/2019

    How the Soviet Union Compelled the United States to Build the World's Fastest Jet: The Lockheed A-12 OXCART

    Posted by Nathaniel Bielawski05/07/2020

    Contemporary America

    Menu
    • US-Industrial United States (1870-1900)
    • US-Emergence of Modern America (1890-1930)
    • US-Great Depression & WWII (1929-1945)
    • US-Postwar United States (1945-early 1970s)
    • US-Contemporary United States (1968-present)
  • Themes

    SPICE Categories

    Specialty Categories

    Special Themes

    Menu
    • Social History
    • Political History
    • Environmental History
    • Cultural History
    • Economic History
    Menu
    • Art History
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Gender Studies
    • Human Rights
    • Public Health and Medicine
    • International Relations
    • Linguistics
    Menu
    • Military History
    • Music
    • People
    • Psychology
    • Religion
    • Science & Technology
    • Sports
    Menu
    • Catholic Heritage
    • The Year 1968
    • COVID-19
    • Social Justice
    • Spanish Language
  • Showcase

    Showcase Editions

    • Vol 1 – 2016
      • Vol 1 No 1 Aug-Sep 2016
      • Vol 1 No 2 Oct-Nov 2016
    • Vol 2 – 2017
      • Vol 2 No 1 Jan-Feb 2017
      • Vol 2 No 2 Mar-Apr 2017
      • Vol 2 No 3 Aug-Sep 2017
      • Vol 2 No 4 Oct-Nov 2017
    • Vol 3 – 2018
      • Vol 3 No 1 Jan-Feb 2018
      • Vol 3 No 2 Mar-Apr 2018
      • Vol 3 No 3 Aug-Sep 2018
      • Vol 3 No 4 Oct-Nov 2018
    • Vol 4 – 2019
      • Vol 4 No 1 Jan-Feb 2019
      • Vol 4 No 2 Mar-Apr 2019
      • Vol 4 No 3 Aug-Sep 2019
      • Vol 4 No 4 Oct-Nov 2019
    • Vol 5 – 2020
      • Vol 5 No 1 Jan-Feb 2020
      • Vol 5 No 2 Mar-Apr 2020
      • Vol 5 No 3 Aug-Sep 2020
    Menu
    • Vol 1 – 2016
      • Vol 1 No 1 Aug-Sep 2016
      • Vol 1 No 2 Oct-Nov 2016
    • Vol 2 – 2017
      • Vol 2 No 1 Jan-Feb 2017
      • Vol 2 No 2 Mar-Apr 2017
      • Vol 2 No 3 Aug-Sep 2017
      • Vol 2 No 4 Oct-Nov 2017
    • Vol 3 – 2018
      • Vol 3 No 1 Jan-Feb 2018
      • Vol 3 No 2 Mar-Apr 2018
      • Vol 3 No 3 Aug-Sep 2018
      • Vol 3 No 4 Oct-Nov 2018
    • Vol 4 – 2019
      • Vol 4 No 1 Jan-Feb 2019
      • Vol 4 No 2 Mar-Apr 2019
      • Vol 4 No 3 Aug-Sep 2019
      • Vol 4 No 4 Oct-Nov 2019
    • Vol 5 – 2020
      • Vol 5 No 1 Jan-Feb 2020
      • Vol 5 No 2 Mar-Apr 2020
      • Vol 5 No 3 Aug-Sep 2020
  • About

    Course Readings

    Article Indexes

    About Us

    Menu
    • Course Readings – SC 3300 – Nash
    • Course Readings – SMC 1301 – Wieck
    • Course Readings – PO 4334 – Dr Celine
    Menu
    • Course Readings – HS 2321 – Whitener
    • Course Readings – HS 2322 – Whitener
    • Course Readings – SMC 1301 – Whitener
    Menu
    • Our Article/Author Index
    • Award Winning Articles
    Menu
    • Our StMU History Media Project
    • Our Faculty Consultants
    • Our Writers
    • Contact Us
  • Descriptive Article, Modern History (1789-1914), People, Political History, World History
  • April 29, 2017

Power To The People: Abbè Sieyès And The Third Estate

Portrait of Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyès by Jacques-Louis David | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Portrait of Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyès by Jacques-Louis David | Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Bailey Rider

Bailey Rider

Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès, also known as the Abbè Sieyès, was a major player of the French Revolution. During this period he challenged the ancien régime system of unequal representation in the Estates-General and fought against the traditional privileges held by the aristocracy and clergy. He believed that the members of the third estate were the true foundation of France and that they deserved to play a role in French politics equal to their importance. As a member of the clergy, and therefore of the first estate, he did not let his privileges influence him, and he worked hard to help the third estate rise to the level of its rightful stature.

In the eighteenth century, French society was divided into three traditional estates going back to the middle ages. Representatives from these three estates had traditionally met in something called an Estates-General, which met when the French king would call for it to meet. Once assembled, it would debate on topics and issues of importance to the realm, and give the king their opinion on a matter by voting by estate. However, last time the Estates-General had been called together was 1614. When they were called upon to meet again, in 1789, they did so in the wake of a major shift in understanding the nature of representation. Traditionally, the first estate was made up of members of the clergy, the second estate was made up of the nobility, and the third estate was made up of commoners, or everybody who was not of the clergy or nobility. They were all ruled by a king, who was considered a part of no estate. Traditionally, each estate had one vote when voting at the Estates-General; thus, the nobility and clergy each had one vote, and they often voted together, while the third estate, which was made up of more than 95 percent of the population of France, only had one vote as well. This was a serious problem because the representatives of 95% of France could be outvoted by the 5% minority of the nobility and clergy. Before they met in 1789, this had not been seen as a problem, because the concept of equal or proportional representation only arose in the wake of the French Enlightenment, becoming manifest in the American Revolution. Previously, the Estates-General only met during times of conflict and crisis. During these times, the peasants were the ones most affected, whether with taxes or extreme poverty, and they never had adequate representation to defend their situation.1 But in 1789, as the Estates-General was being called together, with this change in sentiment about representation circulating in intellectual circles, how would that sentiment become manifest as it had in the motto of the American Revolution–“no taxation without representation?” The man who made it manifest was Abbè Sieyès.

Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès was born on May 3, 1748, and one would not have thought that he was destined to lead an important, high profile life. He was the son of a postmaster and notary, and while he did not live extravagantly, he lived fairly comfortably. As a child, Sieyès had a private tutor, and then he went to college at the Jesuits’ College at Fréjus where his teachers adored him and thought that he was extremely smart. This was important for him, because some middle-class students were regularly recruited to be trained for the clergy, which could mean a social improvement to their current status. When he was seventeen, he joined the Seminary of Saint-Suplice in Paris and made a good reputation for himself. While he was there, he broadened his knowledge and started learning about things that would become his passion later on in life. He showed an interest in the writings of the French Enlightenment, which would influence his decisions and passions. As a clergyman, he was very popular and moved up its career ladder quite quickly. In 1773, by the time he was twenty-five, he was ordained a priest. Quickly after that he moved up to secretary to the Bishop of Treguier, thanks to connections who knew the Bishop of Fréjus. He stayed an administrative priest after this, but worked on other matters that were closer to his heart.2

During his career as a priest, he wrote several works. Two of his works were anonymous and the third is now considered theory by historians. Before he became well known, he wrote the “Letter to the Physiocrats On Their Political and Moral System.” This work looked at the political side of economic activity that was beneficial to the nation as a whole. With this kind of thinking in mind, Sieyès joined the provincial assembly of Orleans in 1787.3

In 1788, the King of France, Louis XVI, was facing serious financial problems, and he called the meeting of the Estates-General for May 1, 1789. As mentioned earlier, the group had not met since 1614, and so a lot of people were uncertain about the role that this group would have in current French politics. However, it became clear even before the Estates-General met that the first two estates would vote against any of the reforms that the third estate might suggest, especially if those reforms infringed upon their traditional rights and privileges; and this caused a lot of debate and frustration.4

It was during the time between when King Louis XVI called the meeting and when the meeting actually took place that Sieyès published his first pamphlet called, “Essai sur les privileges” or “Essay on privileges.” Sieyès argued that privilege went against natural law, reason, and community. Sieyès did not think that the nobility deserved to have special privileges because it did nothing to earn them. He showed how the nobility were like parasites, just taking advantage of French society and reaping the benefits from the work of others. He argued that the current division of society based on estate privileges was not conducive to a well-functioning society. Shockingly, he stated that the nobility had no place in their modern society that was progressing.5

First page of Joseph Sieyes’s (1748-1836) pamphlet Qu’est ce que le Tiers Etat? 1789/ Courtesy of Wikipedia

In December of 1788, months before the meeting of the Estates-General, he wrote another pamphlet that questioned the constitution of the Estates-General itself. He argued for the importance of making a national assembly to better represent the majority of the population that created the wealth of the nation. Both of these pamphlets built up and led to his third and most famous pamphlet, “Qu’est-ce que le tiers état?” or “What is the third estate?”  This was arguably the most influential pamphlet of its time. The pamphlet argued for a drastic change in political power in the French legislative system. It challenged the inequality of power in the Estates-General and questioned why the largest and most hardworking part of society had the least amount of power, and why they had only one vote compared to the combined votes of the clergy and nobility, who made up only three percent of the entire French population. Traditionally, each of the three estates were to debate among themselves on some important issue and then take a collective vote that would be their final estate vote. Sieyès suggested a method that would replace the vote by estate with a simple head count vote of all representatives of the three estates taken together. This pamphlet was radical for the time, because it questioned the right and legitimacy of the first two estates to represent the nation of France at all.6 Sieyès asked three simple questions that put the entire arrangement of the ancien régime under indictment:

What is the third estate?–Everything.

What, until now, has it been in the existing political order?–Nothing.

What does it want to be?–Something.7

By the time the Estates-General met in May, Sieyès was well-known and well-liked by the general population, even though he was a member of the first estate of the clergy. His theories were at first viewed very favorably by reformers and it earned him a seat at the Estates-General as a representative of the third estate, where people took him seriously and listened to what he had to say.8 King Louis XVI had wanted to tax the nobility, who had always been exempt from paying taxes. Traditionally, taxes were first raised on the peasants, but on this occasion, the peasants simply could not bear to pay more. The king had to call the Estates-General together because the two privileged estates did not want to surrender their tax exemptions. Much to their disappointment, the third estate, led by reformers such as Sieyès, looked to the example that America had provided against the British. Thanks to Sieyès and his pamphlet What is the third estate?, members of the third estate asserted their answer to Sieyès’ third question: What does [the third estate] want to be? Something. They broke away from the Estates-General and formed the National Assembly to be the representative body of France, to vote on matters that concerned the nation of France, and to establish a constitution that would bind all members of society into a social contract, including the king.9 In essence, they turned the absolutist kingdom of France and its subjects into the nation of France governed by a constitutional monarch and its citizens.

Emmanuel Sieyès strongly influenced his time by being bold enough to speak out against the abuse of the upper class on the lower class. Even though he could have just stayed silent and enjoy the privileges of his estate, instead he saw the injustices that so many of his fellow countrymen were facing, and he took his stand against it.

  1. Encyclopædia Britannica, 2014, s.v. “Estates-General.” ↵
  2.  Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia, 2016, “Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyès,” by Irwin Halfond. ↵
  3.  Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia, 2016, “Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyès,” by Irwin Halfond. ↵
  4. Encyclopædia Britannica, 2014, s.v. “Estates-General.” ↵
  5. Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia, 2016, “Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyès,” by Irwin Halfond. ↵
  6. Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyès, What Is the Third Estate? ed. Nicholas Snead (Gale, Cengage Learning, 2013), 348. ↵
  7. Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès, Qu’est-Ce Que Le Tiers État. ↵
  8. Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyès, What Is the Third Estate? ed. Nicholas Snead (Gale, Cengage Learning, 2013), 350-351. ↵
  9. Jerry Bentley, Herbert Ziegler, and Heather Streets-Salter, Traditions & Encounters, 4th ed., vol. 2 (New York: McGraw Hill Education, 2015), 474. ↵

Tags from the story

  • Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès, French Revolution, What is the Third Estate?

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email
Bailey Rider

Bailey Rider

Author Portfolio Page

Murder for a Cause: Gavrilo Princip’s Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand

This is not a story about the start of World War I, or the consequences

Read More »

Children without a Childhood: Child Labor During the British Industrial Revolution

Children today spend five days a week going to school for eight hours. During the

Read More »

Intellect Unappreciated: French Mathematician and Scientist Émilie du Châtelet

In the early Eighteenth Century, intellectual themes were not part of women’s duties, and it was

Read More »

This Post Has 36 Comments

  1. Carlos Serna
    Carlos Serna 10 Nov 2020 Reply

    I really like the French revolution and all its phases. For me, it is one of the most important moments in history because it is the inspiration of the Latin American colonies rise arms and demanded independence. I know much of the French Revolution, but I did not know about Emmanuel Joseph Sieyes. I thank the author for explained me his work and teach me more about the French Revolution.

  2. Avatar
    Emmett Pena 8 Nov 2020 Reply

    Abbe Sieyes was such a key figure for the establishment of the French constitutional monarchy. Being able to topple the Kingdom of France and of its radical leaders is such a big moment in history and I am surprised that I am just learning about him now. The author wrote amazing in that they were able to captivate the readers into the life of Abbe Sieyes and learn about his triumph over the overpowered rulers of France.

  3. Jake Faryniarz
    Jake Faryniarz 8 Nov 2020 Reply

    This article was very interesting about who Abbe Sieyes was and what he did. I had no idea who this person was until reading about him and really enjoyed learning how he was a power person that helped lower class people who had trouble with paying the French taxes. It surprised me to see that he was also a big figure in starting the French Revolution to help out the lower class citizens. This was a well written article from the author and enjoyed learning from it.

  4. Avatar
    Franchesca Baldwin 7 Nov 2020 Reply

    Considering how important Abbe Sieyes was and is, I am surprised I have never heard of him before. I always like to hear about the underdogs who rose up to help others, but it is even more satisfying to hear about those in positions of privilege and power, Who use it to help others whether they know them or not.

  5. Alyssa Ramos
    Alyssa Ramos 5 Nov 2020 Reply

    I had no knowledge about who Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès was nor the French Revolution until this year in Foundations of Reflection: Civilization. The author did a great job of providing information about who Abbe Sieyes was and what he stood for. It surprises me how the Estates were set up before because I am used to “everyone is created equal” in America. It was interesting to see how someone who knew his estate held so much power, he still wanted to distribute it among the 3rd estate. Abbe Sieyes wanted to make a difference and he did.

  6. Avatar
    Abilene Solano 4 Nov 2020 Reply

    I never heard of or learned about Abbe Sieyes so reading this article was very informative. I find it interesting that someone who was from a higher position used their status to help out the poor French people who were suffering from the unfair taxation. It is insane that he would end up becoming one of the major players in the French Revolution and was on the side of them commoners since many of them different care for the poor and only cared for themselves. Overall, it was a great article to read and the author did a great job telling the story of a man who gave power to the people.

Comments navigation

Previous commentPrevious

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

StMU History Media

A Student Organization of St. Mary's University of San Antonio Texas

Sponsors

  • College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, St. Mary's University
  • Department of History, St. Mary's University
  • Department of Political Science, St. Mary's University
  • Center for Catholic Studies, St. Mary's University

Support Services

  • The Learning Assistance Center, St. Mary's University
  • Louis J. Blume Library Services, St. Mary's University
  • STRIVE Career Center, St. Mary's University
  • Academic Technology Services, St. Mary's University

About

  • About Us
  • Our Authors
  • Our Archive
  • Contacts

© All rights reserved

Twitter
Facebook
Pinterest