Skip to content

featuring historical research, writing, and media at st. mary's university

  • World History

    World History

    Menu
    • World History
    • Pre-Classical History (to 600 BCE)
    • Classical History (600 BCE-600 CE)
    • Post-Classical History (600 CE-1492 CE)
    • Early Modern History (1492-1789)
    • Modern History (1789-1914)
    • Global History (1900-present)

    From the Ancient World

    Ivar The Boneless: King Killer And Scourge Of England

    Posted by Elliot Avigael03/30/2021

    From the Modern World

    Argentina Dirty War: 30,000 Disappeared - the Fight for Remembrance

    Posted by Aaron Sandoval04/13/2021

    Regional Histories

    Menu
    • African and African American Studies
    • Latin American Studies
  • US History

    Early America

    Menu
    • US-Three Worlds Meet (to 1620)
    • US-Colonization and Settlement (1585-1763)
    • US-Revolution and the New Nation (1754-1820s)
    • US-Expansion and Reform (1801-1861)
    • US-Civil War & Reconstruction (1850-1877)

    BEYONCÉ: The Early Days of the Worldwide Legend

    Posted by Sydney Hardeman10/01/2019

    ¿Inglés sin barreras? Cómo Contribuye el Lenguaje de Internet a la Brecha Digital

    Posted by Felicia Cruz11/10/2020

    Envisioning the Future: the Start of Apple

    Posted by Adrian Garcia12/10/2019

    The Mysterious Death of David Crockett

    Posted by Kenneth Gilley12/13/2019

    Jerry Jones and the Rise of America's Team

    Posted by Juan Arceo11/07/2019

    Segregation and Activism: Then and Now on the Eastside

    Posted by Shine Trabucco06/10/2019

    Tulsa Massacre 1921: Buck Colbert Franklin in the Greenwood District

    Posted by Alicia Martinez11/05/2020

    Cicada 3301 - An Epic Mystery

    Posted by Stephen Talik11/06/2020

    Where Will it Lead (Pb) Us from Here: A Global Necessity or a Disaster Waiting to Happen?

    Posted by Midori Flores11/18/2020

    The Untold Fight of Muhammad Ali: The Strength Behind Each Punch

    Posted by Audrey Uribe12/13/2019

    Unethical Study on Triplets

    Posted by Azucena Cuevas11/24/2019

    Mendez v. Westminster: Planting the seed for Desegregation

    Posted by Erin Vento11/10/2020

    Lucy Hobbs Taylor: The Woman Who Pulled Teeth

    Posted by Giselle Garcia02/28/2020

    El Español y las Oportunidades Comerciales en EE. UU.

    Posted by Danielle Costly11/12/2020

    Seeking Asylum: Finding Assault, Torture, and Mistreatment

    Posted by Maria Obregón10/31/2020

    The Central Park Five: How the Truth Set Them Free

    Posted by Nicole Ortiz11/08/2019

    Feeding Students' Mind and Body: When Education Means Providing Meals

    Posted by Yamel Herrera10/30/2020

    Bryan Stevenson: Justice in the Deep South

    Posted by Bailey Godwin11/05/2020

    World's Best Boss: Steve Carell and His Journey to Becoming Michael Scott

    Posted by Cristianna Tovar12/10/2019

    The Lone Star State: The Reality of Gun Legislation In Texas

    Posted by Sofia Almanzan03/30/2020

    La pérdida del español en el sistema educativo de los Estados Unidos.

    Posted by Sami Bouls11/25/2020

    Perseverance in Preservation: The Hundred-year Historical Development of Woodlawn Lake Park

    Posted by Mario Sosa05/13/2019

    Cambio de Código: Error Generalizado del Spanglish

    Posted by Celeste Pérez González10/27/2020

    Billie Jean King: Ruler of the Court

    Posted by Charli Delmonico12/09/2019

    ¡Si, Se Puede! – Collective Organizing, Unions, and Non Violent Protests

    Posted by Eric Grant11/19/2020

    The Inevitable Fall of Bernie Madoff’s $65 Billion Scheme

    Posted by Nicholas Burch12/02/2020

    The Lack of Latinx Access to Proper Mental Care in a Metropolitan County

    Posted by Ángel Velarde11/05/2020

    The Old Spanish Trail in Southern Arizona

    Posted by John Cadena05/09/2019

    Diferencias Generacionales en el Aprendizaje de una Segunda Lengua

    Posted by Monserrat Silva Urbina12/02/2020

    Ted Kennedy: Reputation Drowns With Victim

    Posted by Charli Delmonico10/16/2019

    Contemporary America

    Menu
    • US-Industrial United States (1870-1900)
    • US-Emergence of Modern America (1890-1930)
    • US-Great Depression & WWII (1929-1945)
    • US-Postwar United States (1945-early 1970s)
    • US-Contemporary United States (1968-present)
  • Themes

    SPICE Categories

    Specialty Categories

    Special Themes

    Menu
    • Social History
    • Political History
    • Environmental History
    • Cultural History
    • Economic History
    Menu
    • Art History
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Gender Studies
    • Human Rights
    • Public Health and Medicine
    • International Relations
    • Linguistics
    Menu
    • Military History
    • Music
    • People
    • Psychology
    • Religion
    • Science & Technology
    • Sports
    Menu
    • Catholic Heritage
    • The Year 1968
    • COVID-19
    • Social Justice
    • Spanish Language
  • Showcase

    Showcase Editions

    • Vol 1 – 2016
      • Vol 1 No 1 Aug-Sep 2016
      • Vol 1 No 2 Oct-Nov 2016
    • Vol 2 – 2017
      • Vol 2 No 1 Jan-Feb 2017
      • Vol 2 No 2 Mar-Apr 2017
      • Vol 2 No 3 Aug-Sep 2017
      • Vol 2 No 4 Oct-Nov 2017
    • Vol 3 – 2018
      • Vol 3 No 1 Jan-Feb 2018
      • Vol 3 No 2 Mar-Apr 2018
      • Vol 3 No 3 Aug-Sep 2018
      • Vol 3 No 4 Oct-Nov 2018
    • Vol 4 – 2019
      • Vol 4 No 1 Jan-Feb 2019
      • Vol 4 No 2 Mar-Apr 2019
      • Vol 4 No 3 Aug-Sep 2019
      • Vol 4 No 4 Oct-Nov 2019
    • Vol 5 – 2020
      • Vol 5 No 1 Jan-Feb 2020
      • Vol 5 No 2 Mar-Apr 2020
      • Vol 5 No 3 Aug-Sep 2020
    Menu
    • Vol 1 – 2016
      • Vol 1 No 1 Aug-Sep 2016
      • Vol 1 No 2 Oct-Nov 2016
    • Vol 2 – 2017
      • Vol 2 No 1 Jan-Feb 2017
      • Vol 2 No 2 Mar-Apr 2017
      • Vol 2 No 3 Aug-Sep 2017
      • Vol 2 No 4 Oct-Nov 2017
    • Vol 3 – 2018
      • Vol 3 No 1 Jan-Feb 2018
      • Vol 3 No 2 Mar-Apr 2018
      • Vol 3 No 3 Aug-Sep 2018
      • Vol 3 No 4 Oct-Nov 2018
    • Vol 4 – 2019
      • Vol 4 No 1 Jan-Feb 2019
      • Vol 4 No 2 Mar-Apr 2019
      • Vol 4 No 3 Aug-Sep 2019
      • Vol 4 No 4 Oct-Nov 2019
    • Vol 5 – 2020
      • Vol 5 No 1 Jan-Feb 2020
      • Vol 5 No 2 Mar-Apr 2020
      • Vol 5 No 3 Aug-Sep 2020
  • About

    Course Readings

    Article Indexes

    About Us

    Menu
    • Course Readings – SC 3300 – Nash
    • Course Readings – SMC 1301 – Wieck
    • Course Readings – PO 4334 – Dr Celine
    • Course Readings _ PO 3365 – Dr Celine
    Menu
    • Course Readings – HS 2321 – Whitener
    • Course Readings – HS 2322 – Whitener
    • Course Readings – SMC 1301 – Whitener
    Menu
    • Our Article/Author Index
    • Award Winning Articles
    Menu
    • Our StMU History Media Project
    • Our Faculty Consultants
    • Our Writers
    • Contact Us
  • Descriptive Article, Global History (1900-present), Military History, Political History, Science & Technology, World History
  • October 6, 2019

The I-400: A Weapon Behind Its Time.

The I-400 under possession of the US Navy | Courtesy of the US Navy 1945/46
The I-400 under possession of the US Navy | Courtesy of the US Navy 1945/46
Aaron Peters

Aaron Peters

The date is June 1941, and the Japanese Empire was preparing to attack the United States to strong arm them out of the Pacific, leaving Japan the sole superpower in the region. The man in charge of putting together the attack was Isoroku Yamamoto, a Harvard-educated Admiral. His efforts resulted in the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, when several Japanese aircraft carriers sailed to the island of Oahu before launching multiple squadrons of planes. Japan ultimately sunk four battleships and killed nearly 2,000 men. It became a race against time for the Japanese as Americans continually encroached further into Japan’s home islands. In 1942, the Japanese Imperial Navy kept losing ground as the U.S. mobilized to enter the war in the Pacific. The Americans had planned to beat the Japanese using their superior manpower and resources, but Japan, being an island nation, was unable to procure large amounts to build battleships and carriers. The Imperial Navy shifted its efforts to building the most technologically advanced ships they could, with hopes to beat the Americans on quality rather than quantity of its naval assets.1

The large cylindrical hanger which planes would be stored in on the submarine | Courtesy of the US Navy 1945

Admiral Yamamoto envisioned the I-400 as a submarine which could hold at least three planes, and that could sail to the United States, Europe, and back. He dreamed that a fleet of them could even sail to the eastern coast of the United States to terrorize Washington D.C. and New York City.2 With the first two of the new class of submarines already seaworthy by 1943, it appeared the program was going on schedule. But then, Yamamoto, the visionary of the program was killed in the Solomon Islands. Combined with the death of Yamamoto, as well as the strained resources being directed to other ships and military equipment, the Japanese Navy’s plans had to be changed, since they were left with only three of the eighteen originally planned, which were known as the I-400, I-401, and I-402.3

Instead of bombing coastal cities, the new mission for the I-400 class was to drop biological weapons on U.S. cities along Hawaii, Alaska, and the U.S. West Coast. Naturally, I-400 class became a prime candidate for spreading fear in the U.S. homeland. Army general Yoshijirō Umezu cancelled this in early 1945, believing a chemical attack on U.S. civilians would be declaring war on humanity.4 The third plan meant to be carried out in Summer 1945 was to sail to the coast of Ecuador, launch the planes, circle around Panama and kamikaze attack the locks from the Atlantic side, where the canal was lightly defended.5

After the landings on Iwo Jima and Okinawa, the Japanese combined command realized the majority of the American forces were already concentrated in the Pacific, and as such, changed their target to Ulithi Atoll, the staging grounds for the American Invasion of Okinawa and Kyushu, the southernmost main islands of Japan. Six planes would be ordered to take out as many aircraft carriers and ships as possible, and the pilots were expected to do Kamikaze attacks. To deepen the element of surprise, they painted the planes in American markings, which was a clear breach of international law. One week before the squadron set sail, the first atomic bomb was used in Hiroshima. Before they could get into position for attack, the Japanese Emperor himself ordered a complete and total surrender to the United States of America.6

Emperor Hirohito Aboard the USS Missouri during the unconditional surrender of the Japanese Empire | Courtesy of the US Navy 1945

On August 28th, U.S. destroyers discovered the I-400s, which had desperately been racing back to Japan. In addition, they had dumped their illicit contraband in the Pacific before attempting a retreat. The Americans were shocked at how massive the subs were, dwarfing anything the U.S. had ever built. Once taken back to Pearl Harbor for further study, the Americans realized that with the oncoming Cold War, if the Soviets ever found out about the I-400s, they could attach nuclear bombs to floatplanes, and strike anywhere in the world. To prevent this, on May 31st, 1946, the I-400 was sunk off the coast of Oahu, the next day, her sister ships would be sunk.7

The secrecy of the project prevented the Allied powers from ever discovering the I-400 project until the end of the war, which was an impressive feat considering that the Americans had cracked both the German and Japanese codes used to communicate with their navies. The advanced technology of the weaponry could have easily been adopted by either the Soviet Union or the United States during the early stages of the Cold War, when the only method of dropping nuclear bombs were using large and visible bombers that needed to be escorted by a squadron of fighters. Had the Japanese Navy procured the materials for the original eighteen ships, perhaps they could have delayed the American advance, or possibly even caused a different outcome had they bombed New York, DC, and Philadelphia. Despite the massive technological and scientific advances made, this class of submarine came too late in the war to change the outcome, and so it became long forgotten under the Hawaiian waves.

  1. John J. Geogehan, Operation Storm: Japan’s top secret submarines and its plan to change the course of World War II (New York: Crown Publishers, 2013), 30. ↵
  2. C. Peter Chen, “I-400 Class Submarine,” World War Two Database, 2008, https://ww2db.com/ship_spec.php?ship_id=S451. ↵
  3. Bob Hackett, 2001,“IJN Submarine I-402: Tabular Record of Movement,“ 2001 http://www.combinedfleet.com/I-402.htm. ↵
  4. Irwin J. Kappes, “Japan’s Monster Sub,” Military History Online, 2007, https://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/WWII/JapansMonsterSub. ↵
  5. Larry C. Bowers, “Japanese were planning attack on Panama Canal in the final days of WWII” Cleveland Banner, 2015. http://clevelandbanner.com/stories/japanese-were-planningattack-on-panama-canalin-the-final-days-of-wwii,23600. ↵
  6. Thomas O. Paine, “The Transpacific Voyage of H.I.J.M.S I-400,” Pacer Farm, 2002, https://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/WWII/JapansMonsterSub. ↵
  7. Burl Burlingame, “UH Team Locates Huge Japanese Sub,” Honolulu Star, 2005, http://archives.starbulletin.com/2005/03/20/news/story1.html. ↵

Tags from the story

  • I-400, Isoroku Yamamoto, Japan, naval history, Pacific front, Warfare, World War II

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email
Aaron Peters

Aaron Peters

Author Portfolio Page

The Hunt for the Bismarck: Menace of the North Sea

Long before the sun rose on May 19, 1941, the German battleship Bismarck left its

Read More »

This Post Has 44 Comments

  1. Avatar
    Santos Mencio 21 Feb 2021 Reply

    The I-400 is perhaps one of the most fascinating military marvels in the world, along side amazing war machines such as Germany’s P.1000. Now in retrospect we realize how impractical Japan’s plan involving the I-400’s was, what with them only carrying 3 planes compared to a traditional aircraft carriers vastly larger compliment but it certainly is an interesting scenario to think about. I do also often wonder how a modern version of the I-400 would look like, with modern technologies could the idea of a submersible aircraft carrier be feasible? Overall a fun and interesting article about an obscure piece of technology.

  2. Avatar
    Nicholas Reyes 17 Aug 2020 Reply

    Great quick read that showed one of the many technological advancements that took place in the pacific war. Japan really though outside the box as they developed a whole new class of submarines; just not with an efficient solution. These new subs brought many challenges involving transporting, launching, and retrieving aircraft. The planes reduced in size to fit in the hangar. Keep in mind that only three subs were made. Each carrying three aircraft. Not much of a dent in what they were used on. Base, ship, or civilian area. The damage that they could inflict was but a mere mosquito bite in the face of the U.S. navy. The torpedoes of the i-400 would be more effective than sending it’s planes to be shot out of the sky. The whole idea just seemed to impractical. Create multiple, high cost, sea vessels with few aircraft than an actual aircraft carrier.

  3. Avatar
    Aaron Sandoval 19 Apr 2020 Reply

    This was an interesting a read, I found it interesting because it seems as if Japan’s plans were not very well thought out. They planned on using these submarines for many attacks, and while these attacks would have been very impactful and could have shifted the tides in favor of them they never acted on them. They planned on using them to use biological warfare on the west coast, but then decide not to, and then plan on attacking the canal in Panama. Japan had their hands on something that could have changed history, but due to what seems like lack of proper planning they were never able to fully utilize what they had created.

  4. Avatar
    Destiny Lucero 1 Mar 2020 Reply

    I-400 “..a massive sub…dwarfing anything the U.S had ever built.” This technology at the time, could have dramatically changed the outcome of the war if time was in Japan’s favor. Japan was just one week too late. While they were focusing on this technology to dominate the sea and air, the U.S was secretly planning the first atomic bomb attack. The U.S was so convinced that this technology was advance and could be potentially dangerous if fallen into the wrong hands. Keeping the capture of the I-400s a secret till after the war then sinking both calmed any worries.

Comments navigation

Previous commentPrevious

Leave a Reply to Aaron Sandoval Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

StMU History Media

A Student Organization of St. Mary's University of San Antonio Texas

Sponsors

  • College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, St. Mary's University
  • Department of History, St. Mary's University
  • Department of Political Science, St. Mary's University
  • Center for Catholic Studies, St. Mary's University

Support Services

  • The Learning Assistance Center, St. Mary's University
  • Louis J. Blume Library Services, St. Mary's University
  • STRIVE Career Center, St. Mary's University
  • Academic Technology Services, St. Mary's University

About

  • About Us
  • Our Authors
  • Our Archive
  • Contacts

© All rights reserved

Twitter
Facebook
Pinterest