The Savior of Rome; Caligula’s Worst Nightmare: Cassius Chaerea

Depicts the Circus Maximus, which is where Caligula held his games for entertainment | Courtesy of Index Forum

The Roman Senate had had enough of Caligula–they wanted a sword run through his body. His policies and the neglect of his duty jeopardized the empire’s safety and legitimacy. In 41 BCE, deciding to take matters into his own hands, Cassius Chaerea led an assassination attempt on the most powerful person in the Mediterranean.1

Because of Cassius Chaerea’s position in the Roman government (tribune to the praetorian guard), Cassius eventually met the person he grew to hate: Caligula, the emperor of Rome. Caligula often ridiculed him, making sure everyone knew that he was effeminate. However, deciding that his public humiliation of Chaerea’s effeminacy was not enough to satisfy him, he often extended his hand to be kissed, while making obscene motions to Chaerea with his fingers. Having suffered enough public embarrassment, Chaerea craved becoming Caligula’s Grim Reaper.2

Caligula regularly tormented his subjects, his senators, and even his own family; no man or woman was safe. Caligula was known to force the wives of noble families to engage in sexual activity with him, often bragging about his debauchery. Caligula even forced husbands to divorce their wives so that he could marry them. For instance, he mandated that Memmius Regulus, an aristocrat, divorce his wife, Lollia. However, not long after this, he divorced her to marry Milonia Caesonia, the woman who gave birth to his future daughter.3 Not satisfied with the wives of aristocrats, he also spent much time in bed with his own sisters.4

His political policies, like his personal relations, were unpopular. For instance, although it was reasonable for emperors of Rome to become deified after their death–a process called apotheosis–it was almost unheard of for a sitting emperor to consider himself a god while alive. On certain occasions, he even dressed as the incarnation of the greatest of all Roman gods: Jupiter. He even established his own cult by decreeing that people worship him as the living god Jupiter Latiaris.5 His demand to be worshiped nearly incited a riot because it tempted him to build a statue of himself in a Palestinian temple.6

Roman boots worn by soldiers; Caligula received his name from Roman boots | Courtesy of Image Kid

Caligula’s mental stability was often called into question after he became sick in October 37 CE; many believed Caligula to be mentally deranged. In fact, after his recovery from the illness, Caligula gathered a large army for the invasion of Britain. He made his soldiers gather seashells–his “spoils of war”–instead of engaging in combat; in fact, the army was commanded by Caligula to do nothing except this one thing. When returning to the Empire, Caligula arranged for a standing ovation, since he was the individual responsible for “invading” Britain.7 Caligula, before leaving the province to celebrate his “victory,” wanted to kill one-tenth of his legions on the grounds that they had nearly mutinied after the death of the first emperor Augustus in 14 CE. Much effort was made to try to stop Caligula from making such a rash move; however, he could not be stopped. He summoned the offending legions, without their weapons, to attend an assembly that was surrounded by an armored cavalry. When Caligula saw that the soldiers sensed something was wrong and slipped out of the assembly to gather their weapons, he at once fled back to Rome to verbally attack the Senate in order to divert the rumors of his wish to decimate the legions.8 Another reason why Caligula’s sanity was called into question involves how he treated people and interacted with them. Caligula once asked the actor Apelles whether he, Caligula, was greater than Jupiter. When Apelles hesitated to answer, Caligula had him scourged. While at dinner with the Consuls, he began laughing hysterically. When they politely asked him what was so funny, he said, “Why else than because a nod on my part would be enough to have either of you slaughtered at once?”9

Depicting the Apotheosis of an individual into divinity | Courtesy of Good Free Photos

Caligula did not know the meaning of financial restraint. When in financial hardships, due to his lavish spending, he extorted money from citizens and bureaucrats. Caligula claimed that the citizenship of certain individuals had been illegally claimed, and used this as justification to acquire their financial capitaleven though official documents contradicted his claims; he also falsely accused people of intentionally manipulating census reports if they had recently added more holdings to their estates. Caligula, under one notorious case, forced Aponius Saturninus, a praetorian, to pay millions for nodding off at an auction.10

Although many were aware that Caligula had his odd behaviors, one of the reasons why it took so long for anyone to consider making a move against Caligula was that he was initially very popular with the Roman people. To make them happy and to keep their trust, he put on many games in the Circus Maximus, an arena for chariot racing; this sport, immensely popular among the Romans, helped Caligula appease the citizens.11 However, even his appeasement to his people did not last long. Over the course of Caligula’s reign, he not only made his citizens unhappy, but he also alienated himself from his Praetorian Guard. The alienation that occurred between Caligula and his guard proved to be disastrous because it was the duty of the Praetorian Guard to ensure the safety of the emperor. Caligula, losing favor with his bodyguard, made it much easier for his end to transpire.12

Depiction of the Circus Maximus, which is where Caligula held his games for entertainment | Courtesy of Index Forum

Many people living during the time of Caligula looked at his actions and knew that someone, eventually, was going to replace him as the emperor. People took the natural disasters that occurred as signs that something horrible was going to happen to him. For instance, lightning struck the Capitol in Capua, and, on the same day, lightning also struck the Palatine Hill. The first event was interpreted as the foretelling of danger surrounding the emperor, while the second sign signaled the death of a wealthy, powerful man. When Caligula was trying to ascertain his future by meeting with Sulla, an astrologer, Sulla told Caligula that his death was inevitable. Caligula, believing that his life was going to end soon, became nervous and put anyone to death that he perceived as a threat; Caligula’s paranoia almost allowed him to avoid fate. When the oracle of Antium warned Caligula of Cassius, Caligula had Cassius executed. However, Cassius Chaerea was not the man that was killed; it was Cassius Longinus, the proconsul of Asia. Had Caligula remembered that he routinely humiliated Cassius Chaerea, the future of Rome might have been much different. Caligula’s extreme caution of those around him caused much tension with the Senate and eventually contributed to his demise.13

During Caligula’s reign, plans for his replacement were considered; however, they were postponed because the opportunity had yet presented itself. Caligula had been destructive long enough, and a plan to assassinate Caligula was forming. As this plan was underway, the conspirators had to be careful around Caligula; they feared that they were the targets of Caligula’s suspicion. Caligula, discovering a plot against his life, quickly executed Letelus Gaetullicus and M. Aemilius Lepidus, the leaders of the conspiracy.14 He began appearing more suspicious and cynical of the Senate, prompting him to reinstate treason trials, causing him to have members of the Senate murdered and exiled.15 During his reign of terror, he executed even his own supporters, and abused many citizens.16

This statue of Caligula’s head was found in Thrace; it shows Caligula as a wise leader; however, as history shows, he was very evil | Courtesy of Max Pixel

On January 24, the day that Cassius relieved Rome of Caligula’s tyranny, Caligula almost unknowingly foiled Cassius’ plans. Caligula, having an upset stomach, due to the food he ate the previous day, was not sure whether he should rise and leave his residence. Realizing that the plan was doomed to fail if Caligula did not leave, Caligula’s “friends,” being able to think quickly, were finally able to convince him to leave.17

Cassius knew that his moment had come as soon as he saw Caligula arriving at the theater.18 The accounts of Caligula’s death vary here. One account contends that Cassius’ subordinates made the centurions that were aware of the assassination plot disperse the crowd so that no one could intervene in Caligula’s death. While Caligula was conversing with Sabinus, Chaerea spoke to Caligula in order to grab his attention; when Caligula turned to address Chaerea, his face was met with Chaerea’s fist, splitting his jaw. While on the ground, he called out to everyone, saying that he was alive. As he flailed on the ground and cried out, the others finished what Cassius started, leaving thirty wounds in Caligula’s body.19

The other account of the story says that, while Caligula was addressing a crowd of people, Chaerea cut deeply into Caligula’s neck, yelling, “Take this!”20 Despite what has occurred, the other conspirators soon joined Cassius to make sure that Caligula was indeed dead.21 Making sure that no heir of Caligula ever ruled the empire again, his wife and child were both killed.22

Even though Cassius liberated Rome from an evil man, the Roman empire still targeted Cassius for execution. Cassius most likely knew that this was going to be the outcome, but his desire for revenge drove him to kill the tyrannical ruler. Cassius’ only reward for removing an evil dictator was, unfortunately, nothing less than death.23 The end of Caligula and his reign sparked a new era of Roman life: one without a tyrant.

  1. Chambers Biographical Dictionary, 2011, s.v. “Claudius I,” by Liam Rodger and Joan Bakewell.
  2. Suetonius, The Twelve Caesars, ed. Thomas Forester (Auckland, N.Z.: EBSCOhost, 2009), 456-457.
  3. Who’s Who in the Roman World, Routledge, 2001, s.v. “Caligula,” by John Hazel.
  4. Richard Cavendish, “Birth of the Emperor Caligula,” History Today 62, no. 8 (2012): 8.
  5. Who’s Who in the Roman World, Routledge, 2001, s.v. “Caligula,” by John Hazel.
  6. The Columbia Encyclopedia, 2018, s.v. “Caligula,” by Paul Lagasse.
  7. Who’s Who in the Roman World, Routledge, 2001, s.v. “Caligula,” by John Hazel.
  8. Suetonius, Lives of the Caesars, trans. Catharine Edwards (Oxford: OUP Oxford, 2008), 161.
  9. Suetonius, Lives of the Caesars, trans. Catharine Edwards (Oxford: OUP Oxford, 2008), 136-168.
  10. Suetonius, Lives of the Caesars, trans. Catharine Edwards (Oxford: OUP Oxford, 2008), 157.
  11. Richard Cavendish, “Birth of the Emperor Caligula,” History Today 62, no. 8 (2012): 8.
  12. Richard Cavendish, “Birth of the Emperor Caligula,” History Today 62, no. 8 (2012): 8.
  13. Suetonius, Lives of the Caesars, trans. Catharine Edwards (Oxford: OUP Oxford, 2008), 165-166.
  14. Who’s Who in the Roman World, Routledge, 2001, s.v. “Caligula,” by John Hazel.
  15. Richard Cavendish, “Birth of the Emperor Caligula,” History Today 62, no. 8 (2012): 8.
  16. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia, 2017, s.v. “Caligula.”
  17. Suetonius, The Twelve Caesars, ed. Thomas Forester (Auckland, N.Z.: EBSCOhost, 2009), 458-459.
  18. Suetonius, The Twelve Caesars, ed. Thomas Forester (Auckland, N.Z.: EBSCOhost, 2009), 458.
  19. Suetonius, Lives of the Caesars, trans. Catharine Edwards (Oxford: OUP Oxford, 2008), 166-167.
  20. Suetonius, Lives of the Caesars, trans. Catharine Edwards (Oxford: OUP Oxford, 2008), 166.
  21. Suetonius, The Twelve Caesars, ed. Thomas Forester (Auckland, N.Z.: EBSCOhost, 2009),  458-459.
  22. Suetonius, Lives of the Caesars, trans. Catharine Edwards (Oxford: OUP Oxford, 2008), 167.
  23. Who’s Who in The Roman World, Routledge, 2001, s.v. “Chaerea, Gaius Cassius,” by John Hazel.

Tags from the story

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email

This Post Has 19 Comments

  1. Avatar

    It’s sickening on how Caligula treated his people and supporters and it got worse when he was told that his death was inevitable, causing to execute anyone he deemed a threat. He was also an egotistical person and has the audacity of ordering his people to worship him as a living god, despite committing several crimes and sins. It’s no surprise that he was assassinated by his people, in fact it’s a miracle that he was able to live that long due to his power and status.

  2. Avatar

    What an interesting and entertaining read! I vaguely knew who Caligula was, but I had no idea just how brutal and insane his reign over the Roman Empire was. I found the part about him ordering his men to collect seashells on the shores of Britain. That aside, I’m surprised at his brutality towards his own citizens and colleagues in the Senate, I suppose at that point, Cassius Chaerea had no other options but to dispose of Caligula.

  3. Avatar

    What an interesting article! I knew that Caligula was one of Rome’s worst emperors, but I had no idea how bad he really was. He really did cause his own demise. When he saw the effect his actions were having on public opinion, instead doing better, he increased his brutality. Also, even though he was literally the most powerful person in the world at the time, he was probably miserable. After all, he was hated by so many, and he was constantly facing plots against him.

  4. Avatar

    Caligula was certainly an interesting emperor that had a crazy take and committed a lot of crimes and atrocities while he was emperor. He really brought his own demise upon himself with the way that he treated his citizens and his friends. It is a great study in the way that people react to being pushed too far and how this can lead to distrust in leadership.

  5. Avatar

    Caligula was a very mentally ill man. It is unfortunate that he was given so much power. No man should delight in forcing people to get divorced, marrying women for a short period of time, and sleeping with his sisters. Caligula’s lies to take money from citizens to fund his projects are despicable. His joy and laughter at being able to make men die is proof of a twisted mind.

  6. Avatar

    ….Yeah, except the people of Rome rioted when Caligula was killed, to the extent that the Senate’s plans to reinstate the Republic were immediately shelved, and they appointed Claudius emperor instead, since he was Caligula’s nearest relative.

    Caligula was utterly adored by the people of Rome, and by his armies. His reputation for insanity is largely due to post-mortem slander, in an attempt at justifying what was the regicide of a legitimate ruler. Your main source, Suetonius, was a notorious gossip-monger.

    Sensationalist, bad article.

  7. Avatar

    Caligula’s name is still widely recognized today as that of a power-hungry tyrant, and reading your article helped me understand why. He committed countless atrocities both in his personal relations and as a ruler, even though he was popular with Roman citizens at first. I did not know that Caligula led to his own downfall by forgetting that he humiliated Cassius Chaerea, instead executing someone else.

    I really enjoyed this article on a turning point in Roman history. Great job!

  8. Avatar

    This was an amazing article and such a gripping read! I knew of Caligula and that he was deemed crazy by almost everyone who met him but I never knew the length that the people of Rome went through to ensure his demise. I personally believe that if Caligula was alive today that he would be deemed insane because how he knew what his actions were doing but decided do increase them x10 if anyone questioned him. How interesting of a man he must have been, a terrible man, but probably quite interesting.

  9. Avatar

    Caligula certainly had more of a taste towards the perversion than he ever did to run an empire. History must always question just how many of his atrocities are fact compared to future generations attempt to further slander him. What is fact is he was a despicable ruler who held horrid morals and detested the senate, and whom made no attempts to work with the government for his people’s benefit. Was he mentally ill, or just a disturbed man who enjoyed torture and ridiculing others?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Close Menu